Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) began a hunger strike on Sunday in support of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who has been in prison since 2008 and suffers from multiple mental and physical disorders.
Speaking at a news conference before the hunger strike began, Lu accused the government of interfering in Chen’s trial and conviction, and violating judicial due process.
Lu served under Chen, who has been in jail for more than six years while his health deteriorated.
Chen’s imprisonment has further polarized Taiwan.
As Lu is almost 70 years old, her hunger strike in support of Chen has been a major news story across all of the nation’s newspaper and television outlets, and was also covered by international media.
A medical team appointed by the government suggested that Chen be released for home care, but the Ministry of Justice refused to do so and also postponed appropriate treatment for Chen.
According to Article 58 of Taiwan’s Prison Act (監獄行刑法): “If an inmate suffering from diseases cannot receive appropriate treatment in prison, it may be taken into account to release him on bail for medical treatment, to transfer him to specific prisons or hospitals with permission of the supervisory authority.”
Lu believes that the ministry has neglected its duties and that there might be more prisoners who need medical treatment.
According to medical examinations, Chen has suffered from serious sleep apnea, severe depression, prostatitis and delusions.
Taiwan’s strong economy and political system, which places a high value on democracy, rule of law and respect for human rights, have offered a strong counterpoint to China, which has long followed a strategy of isolating Taiwan diplomatically, but growing economic ties have brought the two nations closer together politically.
However, the growing perception that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has become too close to Beijing has seen a precipitous drop in his popularity.
Public sympathy for the pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong has increased political pressure on Ma, in addition to criticism of the harsh treatment of Chen, which many legal experts say violates provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political rights, and the UN Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
As she began her hunger strike, Lu was accompanied by Chen’s son and his sisters, as well as Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳昭燮), former minister of national defense Tsai Ming-shian (蔡明憲), members of the Legislative Yuan, city councilors of Taipei and New Taipei City, Chiayi Mayor Twu Shiing-jer (涂醒哲) and many leaders of non-governmental organizations.
Lu declared in front of the National Taiwan Museum that she would remain on her hunger strike until the government decides to release Chen.
If Ma is wise, he should take a first step toward reconciliation with Taiwanese by granting Chen’s medical parole as soon as possible, as the expanded medical team recommended on Monday.
Parris Chang is professor emeritus of political science at Pennsylvania State University and president of the Taiwan Institute for Political, Economic and Strategic Studies.
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Sept. 6 finished its annual national congress. However, if Taiwan wants to have a viable opposition party in its democracy, the results were far from satisfying. The KMT again seems to be caught in a time loop, like that one in the 1993 film Groundhog Day. Yet, unlike the protagonist in that film, the KMT seems unable to learn from past experience and change for the better. Instead, it remains locked in its never-ending cycle of repeating the past. To borrow from a different artistic genre, the KMT echoes Pete Seeger’s song Where Have All