Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) began a hunger strike on Sunday in support of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who has been in prison since 2008 and suffers from multiple mental and physical disorders.
Speaking at a news conference before the hunger strike began, Lu accused the government of interfering in Chen’s trial and conviction, and violating judicial due process.
Lu served under Chen, who has been in jail for more than six years while his health deteriorated.
Chen’s imprisonment has further polarized Taiwan.
HUNGER STRIKE
As Lu is almost 70 years old, her hunger strike in support of Chen has been a major news story across all of the nation’s newspaper and television outlets, and was also covered by international media.
A medical team appointed by the government suggested that Chen be released for home care, but the Ministry of Justice refused to do so and also postponed appropriate treatment for Chen.
According to Article 58 of Taiwan’s Prison Act (監獄行刑法): “If an inmate suffering from diseases cannot receive appropriate treatment in prison, it may be taken into account to release him on bail for medical treatment, to transfer him to specific prisons or hospitals with permission of the supervisory authority.”
NEGLECTED
Lu believes that the ministry has neglected its duties and that there might be more prisoners who need medical treatment.
According to medical examinations, Chen has suffered from serious sleep apnea, severe depression, prostatitis and delusions.
Taiwan’s strong economy and political system, which places a high value on democracy, rule of law and respect for human rights, have offered a strong counterpoint to China, which has long followed a strategy of isolating Taiwan diplomatically, but growing economic ties have brought the two nations closer together politically.
However, the growing perception that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has become too close to Beijing has seen a precipitous drop in his popularity.
PRESSURE
Public sympathy for the pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong has increased political pressure on Ma, in addition to criticism of the harsh treatment of Chen, which many legal experts say violates provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political rights, and the UN Convention Against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
As she began her hunger strike, Lu was accompanied by Chen’s son and his sisters, as well as Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳昭燮), former minister of national defense Tsai Ming-shian (蔡明憲), members of the Legislative Yuan, city councilors of Taipei and New Taipei City, Chiayi Mayor Twu Shiing-jer (涂醒哲) and many leaders of non-governmental organizations.
Lu declared in front of the National Taiwan Museum that she would remain on her hunger strike until the government decides to release Chen.
If Ma is wise, he should take a first step toward reconciliation with Taiwanese by granting Chen’s medical parole as soon as possible, as the expanded medical team recommended on Monday.
Parris Chang is professor emeritus of political science at Pennsylvania State University and president of the Taiwan Institute for Political, Economic and Strategic Studies.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS