Since the “White Shirts” campaign in July last year, it is notable that the nation’s “net citizens” have unlocked a brand new kind of politics, which is opposed to the traditional mode of politics.
After the nine-in-one elections, both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) simultaneously recognized the fact that net citizens were playing a crucial role in the transformation of the political environment.
The film Silent Code (BBS 鄉民的正義) recorded the birth of net citizenship and how it exerts a powerful influence in both the virtual and the real world.
In what follows, some critical implications of the birth of net citizens and their possible effect on net democracy in Taiwan are explored.
During the governance of the party-state democracy led by the KMT, the notions of transparency and human rights were always neglected. This means that in the past, public affairs were carried out under the table, and the exchange of political interests became normal within the structure of party-state governance and beneath the surface of two-party politics.
However, the wave of new socio-political movements (from last year’s white shirt movement to the Sunflower movement earlier this year) demonstrates the fact that “real democracy” will not be controlled by a small number of politicians making backroom decisions and that, in essence, people have the political right to take part in political decisions through the Internet and the media.
In general, the main effect of net citizenship is to revolutionize political orientation and make public issues more transparent and more readily adaptable to meet the public’s needs and its expectations of social justice.
One point that needs to be considered is the debate on “social reality” and “privacy protection” in the virtual political arena. Another issue is that false information can mislead net citizens concerning the obscure boundary between the regulation and the deregulation of “freedom of speech” in the virtual world.
Critically speaking, the sudden explosion of an “Internet army” led by different political groups has demonstrated that we are situated in a discursive epoch where the production and propaganda of political discourse reconstructs the new imagination of political governance.
Nevertheless, what we need to question and rethink is whether the birth of net citizens and net democracy is really sweeping away corruption to create the possibility of “full democracy” in Taiwan. Moreover, the way the quality of net democracy is evaluated raises new questions in the field of social science.
When considering the idea of embracing “net democracy” constructed by net citizens, the concept of democracy needs to be redefined and reconceptualized. The birth of net citizens not only opens up a new possibilities for political participation, it also raises questions about boundaries and the responsibilities of political speech.
Indeed, the real implication of net citizenship in the age of net democracy is that those who control the Internet win the political victory in the end.
Chung Ming-lun is a doctoral candidate at the University of Sheffield in England.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was on Monday last week invited to give a talk to students of Soochow University, but her responses to questions raised by students and lecturers became a controversial incident and sparked public discussion over the following days. The student association of the university’s Department of Political Science, which hosted the event, on Saturday issued a statement urging people to stop “doxxing,” harassing and attacking the students who raised questions at the event, and called for rational discussion of the talk. Criticism should be directed at viewpoints, opinions or policies, not students, they said, adding
RSS