The new Cabinet lineup was announced yesterday and as expected, unfortunately, it looks pretty much like the old one. The list of appointees make it clear just what an empty gesture the resignation of Premier Jiang Yi-huah and his 81-member Cabinet was on Monday.
It also shows what a joke it was for Jiang to say that “any major or controversial policies should be left for the new Cabinet” to deal with because the nine-in-one elections last Saturday had shown that “many people are not satisfied with the direction of the government.”
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) obviously did not get the memo, as he demonstrated in his remarks to the KMT Central Standing Committee meeting on Wednesday, insisting that the overall direction of the country and the “direction of liberalization” were correct.
Premier-designate Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國) also appears not to have heard the message. Given that Mao is close to Ma, he was never likely to differ much in either the policy goals or style set by Ma and Jiang, but it is sad to see just how clearly his roster of players reflects that.
The choice of Minister Without Portfolio John Deng (鄧振中) to replace Minister of Economic Affairs Woody Duh (杜紫軍) — who will become minister without portfolio — is hardly inspiring to those clamoring for more economic reforms and economic policies that are not primarily based on ever-closer ties with China.
Minister of Science and Technology Simon Chang (張善政) will fill the new vice premier slot left vacant by Mao’s promotion, while Coast Guard Administration Deputy Secretary-General Wang Chung-yi (王崇儀) will now head the agency.
Minister of Transportation and Communications Yeh Kuang-shih (葉匡時) and Minister of Justice Luo Ying-shay (羅瑩雪) kept their seats, despite being lightning rods for protesters’ discontent since joining the Cabinet.
In the end, only two Cabinet members have left — if you do not count Jiang — Minister of Culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) and Coast Guard Administration Minister Wang Ginn-wang (王進旺). Otherwise it was just a shuffling of some of the portfolios.
Ma has made a career out of promising reforms. As minister of justice, Taipei mayor, KMT chairman and president, and yet has consistently failed to deliver on those promises. He likes to talk about reform, but he does not like to implement it.
Mao on Monday will become Ma’s fifth premier, following in the footsteps of Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄), Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), Sean Chen and Jiang. The one thing these men all had in common, besides being KMT members, is that they basically followed Ma’s lead. They may have headed the central government, but it has always been Ma’s administration.
Which brings up the old debates about revising the Constitution to change the government from the quasi-presidential system we have now to a parliamentary system and to move toward a legislative election process that would ensure more proportionate representation.
Proponents of such changes should, in the coming months, seek to capitalize on the desire for reform evidenced by voter turnout and ballot choices last Saturday — they might never have a better chance. Our government’s leaders have shown that they are too set in their ways to change. Reforms will have to come from the bottom up, or else there will be a lot more empty gestures to come.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.