“If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen” — a saying widely attributed to former US president Harry Truman — describes a situation in which a leader, once having reached the coveted position, finds it difficult to cope with the stress, pressure, responsibility and criticism that comes with the job. It means that if one decides to stick around the kitchen, the person should know that the heat is to be expected and should therefore quit complaining about it.
This is why many were baffled by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien’s (連勝文) display of self pity at a campaign rally on Saturday last week.
An obviously emotional Lien, his eyes glistening with tears, said that he had been bullied by netizens over the past year, and that he has encountered a lot of setbacks in his life.
“I tell my family and relatives ‘do not cry for me’ because how could I be afraid of blatant verbal attacks, burning satire and freezing irony when I have already had a bullet pass through my head,” Lien said, referring to the 2010 shooting at a campaign rally.
As Lien seemed to choke back tears, his wife, Patty Tsai (蔡依珊), appeared to captivate the crowd as she stood next to him.
Upon encountering such scenes, some are moved to wonder: Why bother running for office in the first place if the process is so painful and miserable and the scrutiny and criticism unbearable?
Lien’s main rival, independent Taipei candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), might have more reason to complain, considering the extent to which the KMT administration has allegedly exploited state apparatus to attack him.
Ko has been accused by KMT lawmakers of laundering money — through a National Taiwan University Hospital account — and illegal organ harvesting, with various judicial, executive and legislative agencies stepping in to investigate, including the National Audit Office of the Control Yuan.
Ko did not try to hide from the allegations; he faced them squarely, an attitude that increased his popularity with healthcare professionals.
One is fair game for scrutiny and criticism when one aspires to become a public official.
It is too early to say whether Ko will win Saturday’s vote, but at least he has clearly demonstrated over the past few months the core values that motivated him to run.
“Due to differences in ideology, an invisible and cold wall was erected in the city between you and me. The wall divided us into pan-green and pan-blue, pro-unification and pro-independence,” Ko said. “The two sides of the wall hated each other and opposed each other. We do not know when this wall appeared, or how long it has existed, but it makes our family relationships, friendships and loved ones suffer. I am here to stand with everyone in the city, to tear down the wall with love and hugs.”
What about Lien? What are the core values driving him? Through his campaign speeches, one cannot help but get the impression that Lien seems to only care about himself and his family, about his being shot and how his wife’s safety is under threat because of the election.
Lien’s campaign team yesterday rolled out a TV spot featuring Tsai recalling the shooting four years ago. The logic behind this commercial is flawed, if not bizarre. What does Lien being shot have to do with his ability to be the mayor of the nation’s capital?
With less than two days to go before voters head to the polls, it is hoped that Lien seizes the remaining hours to woo voters with visionary and positive messages, instead of relying on emotional appeals, sadness, fear, hatred and his wife’s tears.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi on Monday announced that she would dissolve parliament on Friday. Although the snap election on Feb. 8 might appear to be a domestic affair, it would have real implications for Taiwan and regional security. Whether the Takaichi-led coalition can advance a stronger security policy lies in not just gaining enough seats in parliament to pass legislation, but also in a public mandate to push forward reforms to upgrade the Japanese military. As one of Taiwan’s closest neighbors, a boost in Japan’s defense capabilities would serve as a strong deterrent to China in acting unilaterally in the
RSS