“If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen” — a saying widely attributed to former US president Harry Truman — describes a situation in which a leader, once having reached the coveted position, finds it difficult to cope with the stress, pressure, responsibility and criticism that comes with the job. It means that if one decides to stick around the kitchen, the person should know that the heat is to be expected and should therefore quit complaining about it.
This is why many were baffled by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien’s (連勝文) display of self pity at a campaign rally on Saturday last week.
An obviously emotional Lien, his eyes glistening with tears, said that he had been bullied by netizens over the past year, and that he has encountered a lot of setbacks in his life.
“I tell my family and relatives ‘do not cry for me’ because how could I be afraid of blatant verbal attacks, burning satire and freezing irony when I have already had a bullet pass through my head,” Lien said, referring to the 2010 shooting at a campaign rally.
As Lien seemed to choke back tears, his wife, Patty Tsai (蔡依珊), appeared to captivate the crowd as she stood next to him.
Upon encountering such scenes, some are moved to wonder: Why bother running for office in the first place if the process is so painful and miserable and the scrutiny and criticism unbearable?
Lien’s main rival, independent Taipei candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), might have more reason to complain, considering the extent to which the KMT administration has allegedly exploited state apparatus to attack him.
Ko has been accused by KMT lawmakers of laundering money — through a National Taiwan University Hospital account — and illegal organ harvesting, with various judicial, executive and legislative agencies stepping in to investigate, including the National Audit Office of the Control Yuan.
Ko did not try to hide from the allegations; he faced them squarely, an attitude that increased his popularity with healthcare professionals.
One is fair game for scrutiny and criticism when one aspires to become a public official.
It is too early to say whether Ko will win Saturday’s vote, but at least he has clearly demonstrated over the past few months the core values that motivated him to run.
“Due to differences in ideology, an invisible and cold wall was erected in the city between you and me. The wall divided us into pan-green and pan-blue, pro-unification and pro-independence,” Ko said. “The two sides of the wall hated each other and opposed each other. We do not know when this wall appeared, or how long it has existed, but it makes our family relationships, friendships and loved ones suffer. I am here to stand with everyone in the city, to tear down the wall with love and hugs.”
What about Lien? What are the core values driving him? Through his campaign speeches, one cannot help but get the impression that Lien seems to only care about himself and his family, about his being shot and how his wife’s safety is under threat because of the election.
Lien’s campaign team yesterday rolled out a TV spot featuring Tsai recalling the shooting four years ago. The logic behind this commercial is flawed, if not bizarre. What does Lien being shot have to do with his ability to be the mayor of the nation’s capital?
With less than two days to go before voters head to the polls, it is hoped that Lien seizes the remaining hours to woo voters with visionary and positive messages, instead of relying on emotional appeals, sadness, fear, hatred and his wife’s tears.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS