After attending last week’s APEC summit in Beijing as President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) representative, former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) said the treatment that the Taiwanese contingent received at the event in no way belittled Taiwan. What he did not mention, however, was whether Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) handling of the summit suggests that the nation is at risk of becoming another Hong Kong.
When Siew met with the leaders of China, the US and Japan, he received equal treatment only from Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. That meeting was conducted as it should have been, with the leader and the leader’s representative regarded as being on an equal footing.
One can understand US Secretary of State John Kerry’s manner toward Siew — He was polite, referring to Siew as a former vice president of Taiwan. Still, Siew was there attending a leaders’ summit, and by rights his opposite number should have been US President Barack Obama, not Kerry, who was there to attend the ministerial meetings. Nevertheless, there is no great harm in this, since Kerry does not want Taiwan to become another Puerto Rico.
The Chinese side, on the other hand, defined Siew by his role in the Cross-Straits Common Market Foundation — of which he is chairman — and had him bring a group of business tycoons to his audience with Xi. If the US side’s actions did not belittle Taiwan, this certainly did. This treatment occurred before the leaders’ meeting and after Xi had received Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英). Beijing’s intent in behaving like this is clear as day: It wants Ma to be regarded as a local regional head.
When Siew met Xi, Ma was not mentioned, and at an evening banquet, the former vice president was introduced simply as “Mr Siew,” with no official title at all. This all seemed fairly equitable, but when the two men started talking about the so-called “1992 consensus,” it became clear that all that goodwill was a trap.
If there ever was such a thing as the “1992 consensus,” then why did Siew not mention it the year after its supposed inception while he was chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development and represented former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) at that year’s APEC leaders’ meeting? Or when former council chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) hit former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) with the “two Chinas at this stage” (階段性兩個中國) idea?
Under former Chinese leader Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) reign, when China was a closed book to the majority of the world, Western leaders had to rely on official photographs and rankings of senior Chinese Communist Party cadres to construe the rise and fall of government officials. If one applies some of these techniques to assess photos from the APEC leaders’ meeting in Beijing, one can infer what may have been going on in the heads of some of those in attendance.
In one image, Xi is shaking hands with Abe — one of them has a thunderous look on his face, while the other looks decidedly uncomfortable. Neither man is looking the other in the eye.
In a photo of Siew and Abe, both men are standing shoulder to shoulder, smiling broadly.
In a joint photograph of Xi and Siew with their wives, the gap between the two men is as wide as the Taiwan Strait. Xi is smiling, but it is evident that it is insincere, while Xi’s wife, Peng Liyuan (彭麗媛), seems to be keeping her distance from her husband, too, although she is closer to him than Siew, who is standing close to his wife, both of whom are sporting quite reserved smiles.
A lot can be worked out about what happened in Beijing from analyzing those three photographs.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and