Following the debate between Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien (連勝文) and independent candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), the gap in support for the two men has grown. Apparently, the Lien family’s strategy of galvanizing its traditional core base by playing on pan-blue versus pan-green tensions has failed.
Polls have consistently placed Lien’s support rate at 30 percent or below. This is his core support base. It would make more sense for them to attract floating votes of the light-blue persuasion or the moderate swing vote. Trying to buy up voters with policy issues or instil a sense of crisis is no longer effective and could cause an even stronger counter-reaction.
The core are voters who do not look at the issues, but at party affiliation. They are the product of interest groups and party tutelage from when the KMT was the only option.
However, more people are looking at the state of the nation and are asking why things are so bad. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Lien dynasty can try to fool people for a time, but in the end people get wise. If these politicians continue in the same vein, after they have been found out, they are insulting the electorate.
Several KMT members and supporters have already said they would cast their vote Ko’s way, or would not vote. The healthier elements within the KMT might vote for Ko, as this campaign has been one of truth versus lies and good versus bad. If Ko, who represents the better side, wins, he would bring in a new way of conducting politics, which would be a spiritual boost for the entire nation. It would make this election the nation’s second “peaceful revolution.”
Ko is a good man, with a direct personality and the ability to bring together diverse communities. He also has the humility to listen to differing opinions. This is the main reason his support has remained consistently high. His position of trying to move beyond pan-blue and pan-green politics and looking at the merits of individual policies is also winning increasing levels of support among the new generation of voters.
Although the debate was for a local election, it received unprecedented viewing figures, and the low number of responses saying “don’t know” or “no opinion” regarding who won the debate shows that people are engaging in politics. It might be reasonable to assume that encouraging people to vote would bring out the core, favoring the KMT, but the reality might turn out to be the exact opposite.
As Ko represents moderates, a win for him would not necessarily be a victory for the Democratic Progressive Party.
However, it would be a lesson for Ma and Lien, and the political elite they represent, and would give the KMT food for thought on its future.
Certain supporters within the KMT want to see Lien fall from his horse in the mayoral race, and they should also demand the party hold an election postmortem to reflect on what direction the party should go. It is great to see several KMT members and supporters mobilizing for the good of Taiwan. They represent a force for good within the party, and if this force grows stronger, it would reform the party from the inside and make it less elitist, more honest and more representative of the nation. Hopefully, a new KMT, and a more robust democracy, can emerge from this.
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) suddenly, at this crucial juncture, announcing the successful conclusion of negotiations on a China-South Korean free-trade agreement was an intentional tug at Ma. It was the perfect carrot-and-stick combination, prompting politicians representing elite interests, experts and the press to say the deal is a good reason to pass cross-strait trade deals in goods and services. This also says a lot about the nature of the collusion between the elites of the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party.
The state into which the nation has sunk following the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement has already made a lie of the assurances of political and business leaders, especially when the Global Times ran an editorial saying that Taiwan no longer has the wherewithal to resist China. It is true that the nation has fewer resources, but that does not mean it should allow people like Ma and the Lien dynasty to sell it down the river. This is the reason the forces for good within the KMT must stand up and be counted.
Paul Lin is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) on Monday rebuked seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers for stalling a special defense budget and visiting China. The legislators — including Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), Yeh Yuan-chih (葉元之) and Lin Szu-ming (林思銘) — attended an event in Xiamen, China, over the weekend hosted by the Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association, where they met officials from Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO). “Weng’s decision to stall the special defense budget defies majority public opinion,” Wu said, accusing KMT legislators of acting as proxies for Beijing. KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲), acting head of the party’s Culture and Communications
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
RSS