You are what you eat
It is inconceivable that the leaders of the nation’s cooking oil companies would knowingly import feed-grade oil and sell it to the public. The oil contains impurities such as peroxides, free radicals and heavy metals, all of which can pose serious risks to human health.
DNA plays a major role in the human body’s cell mechanism and, unlike protein and polycarbohydrate molecules, is very fragile. Acids, bases and even heat can cause irreversible damage to DNA.
Peroxides and free radicals are very reactive and short-lived compounds, which could attack DNA and other biomolecules in the human body and affect their regular functions.
However, heavy metals are even more dangerous to human health. Heavy metal ions can easily bond to DNA by chelating with the phosphate moiety of the DNA, resulting in the unraveling of the double-strand DNA helix and impairing the transcription of DNA during its replication for protein synthesis.
Once DNA is mutated and the human body’s immune system fails to repair the damaged DNA, the growth of cancerous cells initiates and prospers in the body and produces tumors that eventually hamper the functions of normal cells.
Food safety is a basic right for human beings. Apparently, the government has failed to deliver a working system to ensure people’s health.
The Bureau of National Health Insurance spends tremendous amounts of resources every year on the treatment of kidney failure, liver disease and cancer. You are what you eat. The food Taiwanese eat is most likely the culprit.
Ji-charng Yang
Ohio
‘Cli-fi’ originated in Taiwan
A recent Associated Press (AP) wire story datelined from Tampa, Florida, and written by AP reporter Tamara Lush was headlined “Climate change inspires rise of ‘cli-fi’ flicks” and it said that the “cli-fi” genre was becoming increasingly popular in Hollywood.
The article, which was sent out on the AP wire to more than 5,000 newspapers and Web sites worldwide, quoted an American man living in Taiwan, who has been instrumental in creating the “cli-fi” term and boosting its media profile worldwide.
“Cli-fi movies have emerged as a niche genre, taking the pomp of doomsday science-fiction flicks and mixing it with the underlying message of environmental awareness,” the article said, adding that while new movie Interstellar is a sci-fi saga about an attempt to find a new home for humanity in another galaxy, the movie takes place in the near future, after Earth has been ravaged by a series of cli-fi events.
The article said that while environmental documentaries are important, “feature movies with film stars and vivid storytelling are also pieces of the equation,” quoting the Taiwan-based climate activist who has been credited with coining the “cli-fi” term.
Science-fiction film Soylent Green, from the early 1970s, which depicted a dystopian Earth coping with the ravages of overpopulation, is said by some to be an early example of cli-fi. An online film awards festival called the “Cliffies” that recognizes movies focused on climate change was also set up from Taiwan, although the article did not mention the Taiwan connection.
Among the winners of some “Cliffies” this year are Darren Aronofsky’s Noah and the South Korean film Snowpiercer, the article said.
“We need to go beyond abstract, scientific predictions and government statistics and try to show the cinematic or literary reality of a painful, possible future of the world climate changed,” the American man in Taiwan was quoted by as saying.
How do I know about this? I was the man quoted in the last three paragraphs of the article.
Dan Bloom
Chiayi
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers