On Oct. 21, Ting Hsin International Group (頂新國際集團) executive Wei Ying-chun (魏應充) was indicted by the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office on charges of fraud and other offenses in connection with his involvement in last year’s Chang Chi Foodstuff Factory Co (大統長基) cooking oil scandal.
Chang Chi chairman Kao Cheng-li (高振利) was sentenced to 16 years in prison at the first trial in December last year, but this sentence was reduced to 12 years at the second trial in July. Wei, however, was only indicted recently.
This is hardly proper handling of a criminal case and it has meant Taiwanese have had to consume tainted cooking oil for another year.
Next Magazine reported that after Wei received more than NT$70 million (US$2.3 million) in commission fees on Tingyi (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp’s (康師傅控股) listing on the Taiwanese stock exchange in 2009, it made a donation of NT$5.25 million to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) 2010 candidate for Greater Kaohsiung mayor.
The sum was verified by Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and the KMT’s Kaohsiung branch issued a receipt to Ting Hsin. However, the KMT denied the donation in a press release, and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has not offered any clear explanation of what happened to the money.
The public is concerned about the government’s patchy investigation of the Ting Hsin cooking oil scandal. Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) even said at the Legislative Yuan last month that the group’s oil products were edible.
The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office did not take any action for almost a year after Wei was declared to be in breach of the law. However, after the recent tainted oil scandal became public, Ma, under public pressure, pledged to investigate the case and Jiang said prosecutors should detain suspects if necessary. Only then did prosecutors seize Wei’s apartments at The Palace apartment complex and other assets and indict him.
This shows that the indictment was probably politically motivated, as prosecutors dared not investigate the case or indict Wei over the previous year. As a consequence of this delay in the legal procedure, the public continued to consume tainted cooking oil for another year.
In the past, Wei served as vice chairman of a support group formed by business tycoons for Ma’s presidential campaign. If the Cabinet tries to protect Ting Hsin and does not investigate the case for this reason, it would be guilty of influence peddling.
More seriously, if the government’s protection of Ting Hsin and the group’s political donations to the KMT, such as the missing NT$5.25 million, are the result of a collaborative relationship, it would be a serious case of corruption that according to the Anti-Corruption Act (貪污治罪條例) could result in imprisonment for life for demanding, taking or promising to take bribes or other unlawful profiting by acts that violate official duties. Prosecutors should investigate this in order to give consumers in Taiwan an answer.
Did the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office delay the indictment of Wei for a year, and did Jiang say Ting Hsin’s oil products were edible because they were afraid to upset Wei?
The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office should remedy the situation immediately. The best way to prove that there was no political intervention is to investigate Ma’s relationship with the Wei family. It should at least clarify what happened to the NT$5.25 million donation the the Wei family made to the KMT, so as to rebuild the credibility of Taiwan’s judiciary.
Huang Di-ying is a lawyer and Democratic Progressive Party spokesman.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS