It was not the first time Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) lied to the public, when he was asked on Friday to confirm whether he has appointed Minister Without Portfolio Chiang Been-huang (蔣丙煌) to succeed former minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Wen-ta (邱文達) after Chiu resigned over the most recent cooking oil scandal.
However, it was the first time Jiang was caught lying on the spot.
While Jiang was telling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君) at a legislative question-and-answer session that he could not comment on the matter because the consultation process was still ongoing, Executive Yuan spokesperson Sun Lih-chyun (孫立群) announced Chiang’s appointment.
Later at the same meeting, Jiang appears to have lied again, when he told Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) that he never said there could be more tainted cooking oil products that remain to be found. That contradicts what he told KMT Legislator Alex Fai (費鴻泰) on Tuesday, when he described the problematic products as “unexploded bombs” — as recorded by the legislature’s video system.
Jiang also lied about Chiu’s resignation two weeks ago.
At 10:40pm on Oct. 3, following Chiu’s 8pm press conference, the Executive Yuan issued a press release saying that Jiang approved of Chiu’s offer to resign at noon that day, while earlier that afternoon, Jiang told DPP Legislator Tsai Huang-liang (蔡煌瑯) that he had not yet made a decision about it.
Since Jiang was appointed premier in February last year, he has built a history of lies.
In July, when Jiang rejected a charge of attempted murder leveled against him over the violent removal of demonstrators from the Executive Yuan complex early on March 24, the premier told prosecutors that he had not ordered the eviction, because he was asleep at the time. That ran counter to his statement at a press conference that morning that he had stayed up until very late that night watching live broadcasts on different TV news channels.
Not to mention his claims that the eviction resulted in more injuries among police officers than among protesters and that the police urged participants to leave by gently tapping on their shoulders, rather than resorting to force.
Many more cases could be added to the list.
When public pressure has forced Jiang to drop his opposition to a number of issues — such as holding a referendum on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) and making the cross-strait service trade agreement subject to a legislative vote on each of its constituent articles, among others — he says that he had never opposed the ideas in the first place and blames what he calls misinterpretation by the media.
The crackdown on protesters at the Executive Yuan ruined the respect that many of Jiang’s students had for him since he was a professor of political philosophy teaching German-born political theorist Hannah Arendt’s work at National Taiwan University. At that time, more than 700 students and alumni said that Jiang’s words and actions since becoming premier showed that he had abandoned the faith that intellectuals of social conscience should keep.
This serves as another example of how Jiang has failed to implement Arendt’s philosophy in politics. Arendt, condemning dishonesty in politics, said: “Truthfulness has never been counted among the political virtues and lies have always been regarded as justifiable tools in political dealings.”
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
RSS