On Sept. 26, Yen Ming-wei (顏銘緯), an 18-year-old student, hurled a book at President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). The book written by George Kerr, was Formosa Betrayed. Yen said that he did it to express frustration with Ma’s autocratic ways. It was an example of political expression, part of everyone’s constitutionally guaranteed freedom of expression.
During a meeting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Standing Committee a few days ago, Ma said that he would not sue the student “because he is the president.”
However, Yen had already been served with a subpoena when Ma made that statement. That means that the president was caught lying openly.
Worse still, National Police Agency Director-General Wang Cho-chiun (王卓鈞), in order to support Ma’s lie, stated at the Legislative Yuan that the subpoena sent to the student was ordered by the head of the Taipei Shilin District Military Police. However, that same evening Wang’s statement was discovered to be untrue.
The Military Police Command issued an official press release saying that Wang’s version of events was “absolutely not true.”
Had Ma been injured when the student threw the book, Yen might well have found himself charged with a criminal offense and punished accordingly, if found guilty.
Even if Ma had not sustained any physical injury as such, but felt that having Formosa Betrayed flung at him was injurious to his personal dignity, he still could have brought a criminal lawsuit against Yen, alleging “deliberate humiliation.”
However, this type of offense would — legally speaking — be a case of Antragsdelikt, or “no trial without complaint.” That is, if the plaintiff or alleged victim does not bring charges, the police cannot initiate an investigation.
In terms of being an incident which obstructed official business — a criterion that would need to be met to accord with the ruling by the District Court and the Taiwan High Court on an earlier “shoe-throwing” case, in which Ma was also the apparent target — there is a precedent establishing that Ma attending a social function is not carrying out his official duties as president.
If the person who threw a shoe at Ma could not be convicted of obstructing official duties, there really is no case to answer here, either — unless you count Wang’s evident contempt for the legislature and his wanton wasting of judicial resources.
This really is not rocket science. The alleged victim in this book-throwing incident was Ma. Ma did not sue, so the police have no reason to investigate.
However, even though Ma said he would not sue, a subpoena was still issued.
Wang, the head of the National Police Agency, lied in order to protect Ma, saying that the head of the Taipei Shilin District Military Police had called for the subpoena to be issued.
Both the president and a senior police officer were caught lying in succession, just because Ma was put out after a university student threw a book at him.
What has Taiwan come to?
Huang Di-ying is a lawyer.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS