Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation in a totally different position from that of Scotland or Crimea.
According to US Web site about.com, there are 196 nations in the world, including Taiwan. It also says that the UN lists a total of 193 countries that does not include Taiwan, the Vatican and the Republic of Kosovo — which is in the Balkans and declared independence from Serbia in 2008.
The Web site also says that the US lists 195 countries and does not include Taiwan among them. However, it is well-known that Taiwan has close relations with the US and that when Taiwanese apply for a US visa online, the country name entered into the system is “Taiwan.”
This Web site stated that Taiwan fully meets the criteria for being defined as a country, but due to diplomatic pressures, it has not been accepted as such by the international community.
The biggest problem Taiwan faces in being a sovereign, independent nation lies in the name of the nation. At home, Taiwanese often refer to Taiwan as the Republic of China (ROC), but there are just 20 or so small countries that recognize this name.
Outside of Taiwan, if you tell people you come from the ROC, they often misunderstand this as meaning that you are Chinese, whereas if you say you come from Taiwan, you feel at ease and happy because the vast majority of people in civilized nations know this small island nation of East Asia.
However, there is yet another, even more ridiculous and angering name for Taiwan: “Taiwan, Province of China.”
I am a reviewer in an international academic journal and I review papers submitted from academic institutes all around the world. This journal’s impact factor — a measure of the average number of academic citations to its recent articles — last year was 4.89.
A few years ago, the journal moved its submission process online, with those submitting articles entering information into the system such as their name, institute affiliation and home nation. Editors also enter their own personal information to review articles.
When I logged onto the system, I discovered that the name being used for Taiwan was “Taiwan, Province of China.”
The head editor at the publisher said that this was done according to regulations from the UN and the International Organization for Standardization.
Referring to the nation by this name was ludicrous, as Taiwan is in no way subordinate to China.
To reverse this ridiculous situation, I set about trying to get the country name used by Taiwanese authors changed to “Taiwan.” The result of this single effort was that a total of 900 journals changed the name they used from “Taiwan, Province of China” to “Taiwan.”
Our journal’s editor-in-chief supported my opinion and demanded that the publisher change the name. After a month of negotiations, the publisher agreed. The head editor at the publisher wrote me a letter saying that they publish a total of 900 journals and that they had changed the name of the field for entering the author’s country to “Taiwan” and that they believed other journal publishers would follow in their footsteps.
If this is true, the name “Taiwan” will now be the name used when people register articles in the majority of international academic journals.
Let Taiwanese decide the name of our country for ourselves, as protecting the name of the nation is a duty all Taiwanese share.
Chen Chiao-chicy is a staff psychiatrist at Mackay Memorial Hospital and psychiatry professor at Taipei Medical University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS