Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation in a totally different position from that of Scotland or Crimea.
According to US Web site about.com, there are 196 nations in the world, including Taiwan. It also says that the UN lists a total of 193 countries that does not include Taiwan, the Vatican and the Republic of Kosovo — which is in the Balkans and declared independence from Serbia in 2008.
The Web site also says that the US lists 195 countries and does not include Taiwan among them. However, it is well-known that Taiwan has close relations with the US and that when Taiwanese apply for a US visa online, the country name entered into the system is “Taiwan.”
This Web site stated that Taiwan fully meets the criteria for being defined as a country, but due to diplomatic pressures, it has not been accepted as such by the international community.
The biggest problem Taiwan faces in being a sovereign, independent nation lies in the name of the nation. At home, Taiwanese often refer to Taiwan as the Republic of China (ROC), but there are just 20 or so small countries that recognize this name.
Outside of Taiwan, if you tell people you come from the ROC, they often misunderstand this as meaning that you are Chinese, whereas if you say you come from Taiwan, you feel at ease and happy because the vast majority of people in civilized nations know this small island nation of East Asia.
However, there is yet another, even more ridiculous and angering name for Taiwan: “Taiwan, Province of China.”
I am a reviewer in an international academic journal and I review papers submitted from academic institutes all around the world. This journal’s impact factor — a measure of the average number of academic citations to its recent articles — last year was 4.89.
A few years ago, the journal moved its submission process online, with those submitting articles entering information into the system such as their name, institute affiliation and home nation. Editors also enter their own personal information to review articles.
When I logged onto the system, I discovered that the name being used for Taiwan was “Taiwan, Province of China.”
The head editor at the publisher said that this was done according to regulations from the UN and the International Organization for Standardization.
Referring to the nation by this name was ludicrous, as Taiwan is in no way subordinate to China.
To reverse this ridiculous situation, I set about trying to get the country name used by Taiwanese authors changed to “Taiwan.” The result of this single effort was that a total of 900 journals changed the name they used from “Taiwan, Province of China” to “Taiwan.”
Our journal’s editor-in-chief supported my opinion and demanded that the publisher change the name. After a month of negotiations, the publisher agreed. The head editor at the publisher wrote me a letter saying that they publish a total of 900 journals and that they had changed the name of the field for entering the author’s country to “Taiwan” and that they believed other journal publishers would follow in their footsteps.
If this is true, the name “Taiwan” will now be the name used when people register articles in the majority of international academic journals.
Let Taiwanese decide the name of our country for ourselves, as protecting the name of the nation is a duty all Taiwanese share.
Chen Chiao-chicy is a staff psychiatrist at Mackay Memorial Hospital and psychiatry professor at Taipei Medical University.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS