Both President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who also serves as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman, and former vice president and KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) have impressive educational pedigrees, having been educated in the US.
And yet, for the benefit of the Taipei mayoral candidacy of Sean Lien (連勝文), a third-generation heir to the Lien political and financial dynasty, the two men have somehow persuaded two legislators to risk their reputations to do their political dirty work for them. One legislator is acting as Sean Lien’s campaign chairman, while the second is a popular pundit whose sole focus lately has been Sean Lien’s political rival.
It is easy to imagine that both Ma and Lien Chan will say that this is all above board and perfectly legal, and that legislators are free to act as they please and can defend themselves, as the Republic of China Constitution says nothing to prohibit them from punditry or playing the political attack dog.
Legislators, they would also say, have the right and the freedom to take on other jobs if they so wish.
The powers-that-be treat the rules of democracy with contempt, adhering only to the party-state ideology. They demonstrate a lack of respect for legislatorial independence and the elevated role legislators in their positions as elected representatives of the public, and encourage them to neglect their main duties. It is a disgrace.
Meanwhile, the legislators have no self-respect and are negligent in their clearly defined constitutional responsibilities.
The indulgent resorting to political thuggery, with veins bulging and spittle flying, is debasing to the institution of the legislature.
Members of the US Congress who appears on TV do so for one of two reasons: They are either being interviewed or they are discussing a specific issue, representing the party to which they are affiliated. They are not paid extra for their allotted tasks of keeping tabs on the government or of communicating with the electorate. They do not confuse their roles or become pugnacious political commentators.
In something of a miraculous political turnaround, the pundit, a KMT legislator, previously known for voicing her opinions on political talk shows and occasionally taking issue with what her own party was doing, has suddenly come out fighting in Sean Lien’s corner. God only knows what the KMT did to get at her, but there she has been on TV, sharp-tongued and bullish.
Perhaps she was reluctant to do the fighting for Sean Lien, but she has denied that her decision to do so has anything to do with the Liens’ fortune. She says that knowledge is a form of wealth in itself, and so she is wealthier than the Lien family, and would not be influenced by their money.
She might want to define wealth in this way, but it does not wash.
Lien senior and junior are both well-educated and they also have prodigious wealth. She cannot use this to gloss over the fact that she has turned into the Liens’ attack dog.
The KMT has bull-headed chairmen and it employs bull-headed thugs to do its dirty work.
James Wang is a political commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
RSS