News of the fatal beating of a police officer by a mob outside a nightclub in Taipei’s Xinyi District (信義) on Sunday has sent shockwaves across the nation.
Three suspects have since been detained and charged with homicide, but many questions remain unanswered.
The incident is a grave matter. Taiwan prides itself on being a nation of law and order, so when a police officer — a representative of the law responsible for maintaining public order — is assaulted and killed in public view, something is not quite right, and authorities should not take the matter lightly.
Strictly speaking, the victim, Hsueh Chen-kuo (薛貞國), 38, was not at the scene in his capacity as a police officer, as he was off duty that day. He was not in uniform, nor was he equipped with the accoutrements that officers carry when he was asked to help handle a dispute at the Spark ATT bar. Police reports said that about 50 suspects attacked Hsueh with baseball bats and clubs, dragged him outside into the street and left him to die from injuries to his head and body.
Although Hsueh was off duty, according to the Xinyi District Police Precinct, he felt duty-bound to investigate what was happening when he learned of the disturbance in the area he usually patrolled. Regardless of whether the suspects knew he was a police officer, the fact that they could beat a stranger to death without fear of the law is a serious sign of deteriorating public safety.
Some have asked why Hsueh did not call the police station for backup before stepping into the club single-handedly to try to handle the disturbance. Police reports later revealed that another officer, surnamed Chuang (莊), was with Hsueh at the time of the incident. However, many have also found it puzzling why Chuang, who was on a leave of absence due to a heart problem, did not alert police in uniform to handle the case officially.
There are also rumors of dubious relations between Hsueh and gangsters, prompting some to lament how negative an impression the public has of police that even when an officer was the victim in a tragedy, his integrity is being questioned.
The incident has seemingly turned into a national guessing game, with members of the public questioning the case and the role of Hsueh and Chuang in the incident, as rumors and speculation on the complex relations between police and gangsters mount.
The incident also exposed a lack of awareness and training on the part of the Xinyi District Police Precinct, whose jurisdiction houses many “special business establishments,” such as nightclubs, KTVs and bars that, more so than other businesses, tend to be associated with criminal activity. With that in mind, one would think it is standard procedure for the precinct to increase its patrol and monitoring of the area, so that it is not left to other police officers calling the center to inform it of what is happening on its own “turf.”
One way to put to rest the mounting suspicions surrounding the role of the police in the case is for the authorities to take timely and transparent action to get to the bottom of the matter regardless of the consequences and who may be involved.
Only by exercising determination and getting to the bottom of the incident with transparency and impartiality can the authorities revive the public’s confidence in law enforcement officers, as well as erase its negative impression about police officers in general.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with