The accusations against former Mainland Affairs Council deputy minister Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀), that he leaked state secrets to China, have left the public questioning the legitimacy of the government.
Anybody in battle protects their strategy with utmost confidentiality and do all they can to obtain their opponent’s classified information, to avoid defeat or becoming dependent on their adversary because they are unprepared — the President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration is an exception.
Undercover operations and espionage have always been just as influential in victory as armed combat, as was the case during the Chinese Civil War between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Many of the memoirs that were released after the war evidenced this.
Cross-strait relations are often touted as a “friendship and peaceful interaction between brothers,” but the intelligence war has never ceased, or at least this holds true for China. Therefore, the discovery of a spy should come as no surprise.
This is why, when the US assigns senior officials to office, these officials must first go through a long series of strict and detailed security checks.
However, Taiwan does not seem to have such a mechanism in place and all sorts of gaps exist in its national defense. It is obvious that governmental organizations have been infiltrated at the highest levels and there is now a risk that cross-strait negotiations simply amount to a dialogue between CCP spies and CCP officials.
Few people have noticed that not only governmental organizations, but also civic groups are major targets for such infiltration. A great fear of all civic groups and democracy movements, including the opposition parties, is that nobody joins them and therefore they welcome just about anyone.
Based on long-term experience and observation, I believe that all civic groups, including the nation’s political parties, have been infiltrated by KMT and CCP spies up to the highest levels. These agents constantly fabricate issues to stir up meaningless debate and infighting and harm solidarity and unity, thus ensuring that official affairs cannot proceed smoothly.
This is an alarming development and only those with superhuman intellect and force of character can quickly and effectively put an end to all the damage that is occurring.
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Drew Cameron
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS