After more than a year of debate between the ruling and opposition parties, more Taiwanese oppose the cross-strait service trade agreement than support it. Even among those who support it, there are significant differences of opinion between pan-blue and pan-green camp supporters.
Of particular note is that a majority believe the agreement will have a more negative than positive impact on the nation’s economic and political interests. So, how should the government assuage public concerns and get the agreement passed through the legislature?
First, because the government overstated the benefits of the Economic Framework Trade Agreement (ECFA) in the past and because its assessments of the agreement’s benefits are extremely modest, with estimates showing that it will increase GDP by a mere 0.025 to 0.034 percent, Taiwanese doubt the promises that have been made.
Second, even if the economic benefits of the agreement outweigh its negative effects, because Taiwanese are not sure how they will fare in the face of tough competition from China, a general anxiety is prevalent.
Third, the political ramifications of the agreement are hard to evaluate, making it a guessing game.
To solve these doubts and worries, and further facilitate cross-strait cooperation and integration, the following are three recommendations for Taipei and Beijing to consider.
First, Taiwan should use Kinmen as a free economic pilot zone to promote the free flow of global products, services, capital, personnel and information. Also, if the two nations could establish a joint commission for this, they could use Kinmen as a testing ground for cross-strait economic liberalization and integration, and allow the benefits of cross-strait economic integration to be fully displayed. Also, Kinmen could be used to assess the political impact of cross-strait economic integration and allow Taipei to consider whether it is feasible to allow integration plans to be carried out on Taiwan proper.
Second, China should think about Taiwan participating in East Asian economic integration from the standpoint of mutual benefit and reciprocity, as this would increase support among Taiwanese for broadening the scope of cross-strait economic liberalization.
China should actively support Taiwan’s participation in the negotiations for the proposed Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and allow Taiwan to take part in negotiations with the other potential member nations so that by the time the potential members have signed the partnership, Taiwan can also take part in it. In addition to this, China should support Taiwan participating in the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Because the partnership is an economic integration agreement that involves high levels of liberalization, China will have a tough time in the short term adjusting the structure of its economy to suit the agreement, and if Taiwan was to first participate, it could provide Chinese businesses with a platform for entering the international market, which will result in a win-win situation.
Third, a referendum should be used to solve the debates going on within Taiwan over the cross-strait service trade agreement. Many opinion polls from the past show that pan-blue and pan-green camp supporters have vastly differing opinions when it comes to the agreement, which has seen the two sides locked in fierce opposition over the issue of cross-strait economic integration. However, according to an opinion poll conducted by TVBS in March, 61 percent of respondents support the idea of using a referendum to make a final decision on the agreement, with only 31 percent against the idea.
The only way to make both camps accept the final decision on the agreement is to use a democratic procedure. This would also help solve the problems of opposition and deadlock that are going on in the legislature.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just