Over the past several days, the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has rolled out the propaganda machine to alarm the public about the impact on Taiwan that a free-trade agreement (FTA) between China and South Korea would have. The question is, will the China-South Korea pact actually threaten Taiwan in any way?
Taiwan should actually welcome a successful completion of trade negotiations between China and South Korea, and the more liberal the agreement the better for Taiwan it will be. There are several reasons for this.
First, South Korea is neither Singapore nor Hong Kong. Singapore and Hong Kong are both city economies and, as such, welcome deregulation as they do not have to worry about industry in the periphery. South Korea and Taiwan, on the other hand, have to consider their agriculture sectors, upon which their populations rely, and their manufacturing sectors, on which other industries rely to develop. For these medium-sized economies, with their land and populations, FTAs have advantages and disadvantages, and for them it is not a case of the more FTAs signed the better.
Second, the Ma administration likes to use South Korea’s FTAs with other countries as a cover for its own failures. Do not be taken in. South Korea’s FTA agreements with the EU and the US did not come into force until 2011 and 2012 respectively. South Korea surpassed Taiwan’s exports some time ago and proceeded to pull even further ahead.
South Korea was outstripping Taiwan in terms of both exports and GDP before it adopted its current policy of signing FTAs. Its success dates back to the time it decided to invest in its domestic economy, the same period of “economic unification” across the Taiwan Strait in which Taiwan was so anxious to align its economy with that of China. In other words, the predominant reason South Korea was able to outperform Taiwan prior to 2011 was that the South Korean government was investing in improving the country’s industrial base, while the government in Taiwan was pushing liberalization and actively deregulating investment in China. During this period, South Korean investment in China was less than a 10th of what Taiwan was investing there.
Third, the FTA China and South Korea are negotiating is entirely different from those it has already signed with the EU and the US. South Korea and China are neighbors and China’s extensive territory, population of 1.3 billion and large market exert a huge pull on surrounding economies. No matter how self-sufficient or patriotic South Korea is, China would still have a considerable magnetic effect.
Whatever shape or form the China-South Korea FTA takes when signed, the higher the degree of liberalization, the stronger this attraction is to become. This may be great for financial groups in South Korea, but it does not bode well for the long-term development of the country as a whole. The detrimental effect it is to have may not be felt as quickly as it has been in Taiwan, but it cannot be ignored. South Korea will almost certainly follow in the footsteps of Taiwan, ending up as little more than another Chinese outpost.
Fourth, the idea that FTAs contribute to economic growth is something of a myth propagated by capitalists. The Ma administration has repeatedly said that the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement and the cross-strait service trade and trade in goods agreements will bolster growth of GDP to entice the public to support these policies. However, the facts have shown these assurances to be little more than lies.
South Korea serves as another example. The country has not exactly taken off after it started pushing the signing of FTAs in 2011; indeed, this was the date that signaled the setting of its sun. In 2010 its GDP grew by 6.5 percent, but in 2011 this figure fell to 3.63 percent, and then 2.29 percent in 2012. Last year GDP only grew by 2.97 percent. The heady days of the “Miracle on the Han River,” where the country commonly posted growth rates of 5 or 6 percent, are long gone.
What goes around comes around. If China and South Korea sign their FTA this year, Taiwan need not worry. The proposed China-South Korea pact should be seen as an opportunity, not a threat to Taiwan. So long as we give up harmful policies such as the service trade and trade in goods agreements and the free economic pilot zones, and consolidate the economy at home as a base from which to engage with the global market, we will be back on the right path. Indeed, we are already seeing an economic recovery in the wake of the Sunflower movement.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS