An uproar over the questionable hiring and padding of pension plans for a few Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members and their allies appears unlikely to die down quietly — nor should it. As an aging nation, retirement and pensions are increasingly crucial issues that need to be addressed.
On Thursday, the Control Yuan reprimanded the Taiwan Provincial Government over its hiring of former Government Information Office (GIO) official Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英) in March because it appeared that a job had been created especially for him.
Showing some of the incredible chutzpah for which he became famous a few years ago, Kuo had applied for retirement on April 22, just one month after he had been appointed foreign affairs secretary-general, a promotion that would earn him a bump in pension pay. Despite working for the provincial government for less than six months, he is apparently qualified to retire on a full pension.
Kuo’s chutzpah landed him in hot water in 2009 after some comments he posted online under the pen name Fan Lan-chin (范蘭欽) — while he was serving in Toronto for the GIO — came to light, showing a clear disdain for the very people he was supposed to be representing and who were paying his salary.
Referring to himself as “high-class Mainlander,” Kuo wrote: “[China] should spend many years suppressing [people in Taiwan] instead of granting [them] any political freedom once they have taken Taiwan by force.” He also called Taiwan a “ghost island” and said Taiwanese were “rednecks.”
He lost the cushy Toronto post and, upon returning to Taipei, was sacked by the GIO. In May the following year, his online postings led the Taiwan High Court to find him guilty of defaming Taiwan University professor Chen Shih-meng (陳師孟) and political commentator Chin Heng-wei (金恆煒), whom he had described as “official violent dogs for Taiwanese independence” and using “violence to oppress the weak.”
However, despite this, Kuo could still walk off with a nice pension. His retirement application has already been processed and a Ministry of Civil Service official said the ministry would have to review whether the Control Yuan reprimand of the Taiwan Provincial Government would have any effect on Kuo’s status.
Former New Party legislator Hsieh Chi-ta (謝啟大) has not fared quite so well, though she is unlikely to face poverty in her golden years.
The Taipei City Government hired Hsieh in July last year — a year ahead of retirement age — and she was promoted to senior specialist at its secretariat just ahead of her 65th birthday, apparently to boost her pension. She had put in 22 years as a bureaucrat before moving to China, where she worked for 10 years.
At the beginning of May, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) defended Hsieh’s position as “well-placed” given her legal expertise, while Hsieh said she had no intentions of quitting her job. On May 8, she did just that, after Hau criticized her for traveling to China to appear on a TV talk show in which she criticized the Sunflower movement protests. She announced she would not receive a pension.
There is no reason an individual should not be able to go on working as long as they are able to or interested in doing so. Age should not be a bar to qualified individuals being hired. However, Kuo’s and Hsieh’s cases raised a lot of red flags about qualifications. Neither could be explained as normal hiring practice for a civil service position.
The problem is that cases like theirs give lie to the government’s promises to reform the pension system, which is overwhelmingly stacked against low-paid private sector and farm workers in favor of politicians, bureaucrats, the military and public school teachers.
Questions about the financial viability of the Labor Insurance Fund and increasing drain on the nation’s coffers of the pension plan for retired military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers have been debated for years. It is time for them to be resolved.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath