The bribery scandal involving a Taoyuan County official and land developer, Farglory Group chairman Chao Teng-hsiung (趙藤雄), disrupted the government’s efforts to offer accessible housing for young people, dealing a new setback to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, whose housing policies were already weak.
Chao was detained on allegations that he bribed former Taoyuan County deputy commissioner Yeh Shi-wen (葉世文) to secure a NT$1.3 billion (US$43.3 million) contract to build the country’s largest affordable housing project in Taoyuan’s Bade City (八德). Investigators suspect that Chao might also have conspired to suborn Yeh in securing another bid to construct an affordable housing complex in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口) in 2012.
The Taoyuan County government made an abrupt policy U-turn on Monday, saying that the local government would scrap the contract with Farglory and halt the ongoing affordable housing projects. Instead, the local government plans to lease more of the 10,000 housing units in Bade when construction is completed, originally scheduled for 2016.
The Ministry of the Interior, which is in charge of providing accommodation via social housing and affordable housing units, said the central government would not launch any new affordable housing programs. Local governments are still eligible to introduce new affordable housing projects to boost finances, the ministry said.
During the sixth anniversary of his inauguration two weeks ago, Ma again pledged to solve housing problems — short supply and skyrocketing costs — by offering social housing units for lease only and housing units for sale at 30 percent lower than market prices, as well as providing subsidies or mortgages for disabled people, low-income families and young people.
With all those measures in place, Ma said the government’s housing policy would help 100,000 Taiwanese to rent or buy an apartment within 10 years.
However, this is almost nothing compared with South Korea’s government projects, which have built 1.2 million social housing units in a decade, Takming University of Science and Technology professor Hua Ching-chun (花敬群) said.
Even the government’s minimal efforts could turn out to be worthless, considering their small scale and corruption by government officials. It seems that Ma’s pledge to serve “housing justice” is empty words.
The government needs to overhaul its existing housing polices, since they did not rein in property prices. It could completely abandon affordable housing units. The policy was controversial when it was introduced and some industry experts are worried that the policy will aggravate sky-high property prices and encourage price speculation, rather than curb rising property prices.
Investing in affordable housing units could be a lucrative business for owners of affordable housing units because they could sell the apartments after 10 years and make a big profit, as long as the selling price is 30 percent lower than prices in adjacent areas.
Offering social housing units, which are for rent only, is more pragmatic than the low-cost housing units. However, the program is in limbo, given the snail’s pace at which state-owned land is being released to build the complexes.
The government should extend financial aid to people who cannot afford to buy a house, including to low-income households, rather than focusing on young people. As long as the nation’s coffers are being depleted, the government should lend a hand to those most in need.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS