By this time, Ukraine must have many regrets. Among those, two stand out as the most regretful — the sale of the aircraft carrier Varyag to China in April 1998 and the handover of its nuclear weapons to Russia in 1996.
In retrospect, Ukraine would wish that both actions had not been taken, but the damage has been done.
In 1996, at the urging of then-US president Bill Clinton, Ukraine sped up, and actually completed, the handover of the country’s nuclear arsenal in exchange for assurances of its territorial security and integrity delineated by the Budapest Agreement of 1994 and signed by five parties — the US, the UK, Russia, China and France.
Last year, after years refurbishing the vessel, China successfully placed its first aircraft carrier in service, thanks to the Ukrainian ready-built hulk.
In early March, Russia trashed the Budapest Agreement and invaded Crimea.
Given that China has been enjoying almost unlimited access to Ukraine’s military technologies over the past decade and a half, it would have been expected to lend support on behalf of Ukraine. However, China acquiesced when Russia annexed Crimea in late March. Russian assurance weighs less than the paper on which it was written.
Worst yet, China is now threatening countries, including Taiwan, in the East and the South China seas with the aircraft carrier.
Decisions made and actions taken at an earlier time in a seemingly benign setting often have unexpected, sometimes malignant, consequences.
Ukraine’s sale of the ship to China under the pretext that it was to be converted into a floating hotel is exactly one of those decisions thought innocuous when it was made.
The past few days, Russia has dispatched half a dozen of its naval cruisers and frigates to China for a joint exercise. In the meantime, a Chinese oil rig with a military escort has anchored in disputed waters near Vietnam, with the action stirring up riots against Taiwanese and Japanese investments in several Vietnamese cities.
There is a huge difference between a floating, commercial hotel and a mobile airfield equipped with dozens of attack fighters. A self-powered platform carrying unmanned aerial drones in the Strait of Malacca, or the Taiwan Strait, is perhaps not what Ukraine had envisioned when it decided to sell the ship.
The financial gain that Ukraine derived is not only now a thorn in the side of Taiwan, Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam and the Philippines, but also a boomerang that can potentially bite Ukraine too.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the Taiwan Public Policy Council in the US.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with