By this time, Ukraine must have many regrets. Among those, two stand out as the most regretful — the sale of the aircraft carrier Varyag to China in April 1998 and the handover of its nuclear weapons to Russia in 1996.
In retrospect, Ukraine would wish that both actions had not been taken, but the damage has been done.
In 1996, at the urging of then-US president Bill Clinton, Ukraine sped up, and actually completed, the handover of the country’s nuclear arsenal in exchange for assurances of its territorial security and integrity delineated by the Budapest Agreement of 1994 and signed by five parties — the US, the UK, Russia, China and France.
Last year, after years refurbishing the vessel, China successfully placed its first aircraft carrier in service, thanks to the Ukrainian ready-built hulk.
In early March, Russia trashed the Budapest Agreement and invaded Crimea.
Given that China has been enjoying almost unlimited access to Ukraine’s military technologies over the past decade and a half, it would have been expected to lend support on behalf of Ukraine. However, China acquiesced when Russia annexed Crimea in late March. Russian assurance weighs less than the paper on which it was written.
Worst yet, China is now threatening countries, including Taiwan, in the East and the South China seas with the aircraft carrier.
Decisions made and actions taken at an earlier time in a seemingly benign setting often have unexpected, sometimes malignant, consequences.
Ukraine’s sale of the ship to China under the pretext that it was to be converted into a floating hotel is exactly one of those decisions thought innocuous when it was made.
The past few days, Russia has dispatched half a dozen of its naval cruisers and frigates to China for a joint exercise. In the meantime, a Chinese oil rig with a military escort has anchored in disputed waters near Vietnam, with the action stirring up riots against Taiwanese and Japanese investments in several Vietnamese cities.
There is a huge difference between a floating, commercial hotel and a mobile airfield equipped with dozens of attack fighters. A self-powered platform carrying unmanned aerial drones in the Strait of Malacca, or the Taiwan Strait, is perhaps not what Ukraine had envisioned when it decided to sell the ship.
The financial gain that Ukraine derived is not only now a thorn in the side of Taiwan, Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam and the Philippines, but also a boomerang that can potentially bite Ukraine too.
Kengchi Goah is a senior research fellow at the Taiwan Public Policy Council in the US.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS