Tue, Apr 29, 2014 page8

• Ma ignores Lin at his own peril

  • By Chien Hsi-chieh 簡錫堦
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) met with his trusted advisers and colleagues at a high-level meeting to discuss how to deal with the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄), currently on hunger strike to protest at the continued construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮).

  In the meeting, they apparently decided that Lin’s actions were born of his own obstinacy and that the government need not respond.

  It should press on with the construction of the plant and after the scheduled safety checks are carried out in June, put the fate of the plant to a referendum, in line with current legislation.

  If the move to halt construction fails to reach the required threshold, the situation will have been resolved.

  The pro-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) media and political pundits are playing along with this, saying that Lin should not be holding government policy or the rule of law hostage in this way, in the hope that they can alleviate some of the political pressure Lin’s hunger strike is placing on the government.

  Ma perhaps thinks that Lin’s friends, family and supporters will be unwilling to see him perish and will not stop the government from force-feeding him if the situation becomes desperate.

  This would allow the government to dissipate the present political crisis on the pretext of humanitarian intervention. In doing so it is underestimating Lin’s resolve and this is the greatest insult of all.

  When former Indian independence leader Mahatma Gandhi protested against British colonial rule by staging a hunger strike, the British authorities did not dare force-feed him. Instead, they brought the situation to a resolution by introducing reforms to satisfy Gandhi’s demands.

  Prior to the advent of Indian independence, political tensions and violent clashes between Hindus and Muslims made it impossible for the two to exist side-by-side.

  Again, Gandhi went on hunger strike, calling on the two sides to cease the violence. Both sides were certain of Gandhi’s resolve to follow the strike through to its final conclusion and reluctant to cause the death of a person they regarded as a sage and a saint, brought a quick end to the fighting. Nobody would have dared force-feed Gandhi, as it would have offended his personal dignity.

  In 2002 I made a visit to Northern Ireland, where I saw many walls daubed with pictures of people who had starved themselves to death because of their political convictions.

  Everywhere there were telephone poles decorated with fliers marking the 10th anniversary of their deaths. Seven jailed members of the Irish Republican Army died on hunger strikes while in jail. Their unshakeable determination to encourage Northern Ireland to strive for autonomy shocked the world.

  In 1989, the fact that Taiwanese publisher and pro-democracy activist Deng Nan-jung (鄭南榕) was prepared to self-immolate to protest his imminent arrest by the KMT authorities galvanized the Taiwanese public into pushing for the right of freedom of expression.

  Of the members of the DPP’s former New Tide faction, former National Security Council secretary-general Chiou I-jen (邱義仁) and I were probably the closest to Deng. We were told to go and talk to him, to exhort him to continue living and keep fighting the KMT.

  Deng suggested that I read the history of the South Korean student movements that he had published, saying it would help me understand why he was so determined to set himself on fire as a form of protest.

  It was the self-immolation of a young South Korean worker that had awoken the students in the first place, and that had been the reason student movements in that country would later become such a powerful social force and the predominant driver behind the democratization of politics.

  After I had come to understand what he was doing, I stopped trying to get him to abandon his plan. His mind was made up, and nobody was going to get him to change it.

  The lack of wisdom or empathy demonstrated by Ma and Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) has brought us to the brink of a political catastrophe. On Feb 28, 1980, Lin’s mother and twin daughters were murdered, victims of the fight for Taiwan’s democracy. If Lin now dies as a result of this hunger strike, three generations of the family would have been sacrificed for the cause and the foreign KMT regime will have shown that it has not changed.

  The best way to resolve the controversy over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is for the government to announce that it will order a temporary halt to the construction, to alleviate the public’s worries and concerns.

  Then, it should put the special statute calling for a referendum on the plant proposed by the DPP through a second and third reading in the legislature, and speed up its passage, to improve upon the current incarnation of the “birdcage” Referendum Act (公投法).

  When that is done, it can hold a referendum on the plant to coincide with the year-end seven-in-one legislative elections, so that the public can decide whether the plant should be completed or scrapped altogether.

  This would be how the fate of a contentious public construction project is decided in a normal democratic country, according to agreed democratic procedure.

  Ma’s own brand of despotic bumbling will get us nowhere but into political crisis and confusion.

  Chien Hsi-chieh is executive director of the Peacetime Foundation of Taiwan.

  Translated by Paul Cooper
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Chinese technicians join airport MRT project

  • 2

    Apple is giving Intel’s turnaround some momentum

  • 3

    A train for whom? Is a new monorail helpful for Cairo?

  • 4

    Uncrewed US craft transits the Taiwan Strait

  • 5

    Taiwan assessing recruiting from Eswatini: ministry