History is replete with examples of hubris and its nefarious consequences for both perpetrator and those on the receiving end. Sadly for us all, every great power seems powerless against its call — and that includes China.
Hubris manifests itself in various ways, including arrogance, unchecked nationalistic sentiment, imperial overstretch, chauvinism, racism and, quite often, impoliteness. We all remember former US secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld’s comments about “old Europe,” just months before the administration of former US president George W. Bush embarked on its misadventure in Iraq, an act, born out of hubris, that did more to undermine the US’ image and security than anything else could possibly have done.
Empires before it have collapsed as a result of mistaken policies resulting from an epidemic of hubris among government officials and the public in whose name they ruled.
Enter China. Though it is not exactly a great power yet, it has already adopted the mindset and behavior attendant to such a status, which is rather odd for a civilization with a reputation for great patience. The Chinese Communist Party has gotten drunk with its success and now seems in a rush — impatient, in fact — to put its “century of humiliation” well behind it, even if this means skipping over some of the necessary steps to greatness.
As it ascends, China has in recent years threatened its neighbors, insulted its partners, ignored middling powers and acted in ways that cause serious harm to its self-proclaimed image as a responsible stakeholder. It now acts like a child that has suddenly outgrown other children its age and uses its physical advantages to bully others, without thinking about how this might undermine its reputation.
The odd thing is that the child is indiscriminate in who it targets and will just as happily pick on a child twice its size as it will a fragile featherweight. Chinese officials have displayed tremendous arrogance in Europe, treating its parliament with great disrespect, and have been increasingly rude and confrontational in the US, often by hijacking academic conferences.
That hubris also affects how China treats Taiwan, often in ways that contradict its charm offensive to win the hearts and minds of Taiwanese and perhaps create the conditions for eventual “peaceful unification.” It organizes and attends cross-strait academic forums, but more often than not, participants on the Chinese side are there to lecture, not to learn. It harps on about the shared ancestors and the greatness of the “Chinese race,” of the blood shared by people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, but will immediately repress any expression of individuality, or even locality, by Taiwanese.
Taiwanese tennis player Hsieh Su-wei’s (謝淑薇) Chinese partner at Wimbledon, Peng Shuai (彭帥), showed the extent to which Chinese will go in their chauvinism when, after winning the women’s doubles title on Saturday, she interrupted Hsieh during an interview and said that she could not accept that Taiwan is a country. At a moment when people on both sides of the Strait should have been rejoicing, Peng — like many other Chinese — could not help herself and acted in a way that, to paraphrase the Chinese refrain, “hurt the feelings of the Taiwanese people.”
Rather than celebrate a successful collaboration, Peng repressed a Taiwanese and clearly showed that, in Beijing’s view, the relationship across the Taiwan Strait, no matter how much it improves, will never be one of equals. Chinese treatment of other minorities, such as Tibetans and Uighurs, is proof that “Han Chinese” will always be primus inter pares, a fate that equally applies to Taiwan and Hong Kong and that will only highlight and exacerbate the differences that exist between those peoples.
Hubris, above all, is characterized by self-defeating behavior, and China is well on its way to refining the art.
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS