History is replete with examples of hubris and its nefarious consequences for both perpetrator and those on the receiving end. Sadly for us all, every great power seems powerless against its call — and that includes China.
Hubris manifests itself in various ways, including arrogance, unchecked nationalistic sentiment, imperial overstretch, chauvinism, racism and, quite often, impoliteness. We all remember former US secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld’s comments about “old Europe,” just months before the administration of former US president George W. Bush embarked on its misadventure in Iraq, an act, born out of hubris, that did more to undermine the US’ image and security than anything else could possibly have done.
Empires before it have collapsed as a result of mistaken policies resulting from an epidemic of hubris among government officials and the public in whose name they ruled.
Enter China. Though it is not exactly a great power yet, it has already adopted the mindset and behavior attendant to such a status, which is rather odd for a civilization with a reputation for great patience. The Chinese Communist Party has gotten drunk with its success and now seems in a rush — impatient, in fact — to put its “century of humiliation” well behind it, even if this means skipping over some of the necessary steps to greatness.
As it ascends, China has in recent years threatened its neighbors, insulted its partners, ignored middling powers and acted in ways that cause serious harm to its self-proclaimed image as a responsible stakeholder. It now acts like a child that has suddenly outgrown other children its age and uses its physical advantages to bully others, without thinking about how this might undermine its reputation.
The odd thing is that the child is indiscriminate in who it targets and will just as happily pick on a child twice its size as it will a fragile featherweight. Chinese officials have displayed tremendous arrogance in Europe, treating its parliament with great disrespect, and have been increasingly rude and confrontational in the US, often by hijacking academic conferences.
That hubris also affects how China treats Taiwan, often in ways that contradict its charm offensive to win the hearts and minds of Taiwanese and perhaps create the conditions for eventual “peaceful unification.” It organizes and attends cross-strait academic forums, but more often than not, participants on the Chinese side are there to lecture, not to learn. It harps on about the shared ancestors and the greatness of the “Chinese race,” of the blood shared by people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, but will immediately repress any expression of individuality, or even locality, by Taiwanese.
Taiwanese tennis player Hsieh Su-wei’s (謝淑薇) Chinese partner at Wimbledon, Peng Shuai (彭帥), showed the extent to which Chinese will go in their chauvinism when, after winning the women’s doubles title on Saturday, she interrupted Hsieh during an interview and said that she could not accept that Taiwan is a country. At a moment when people on both sides of the Strait should have been rejoicing, Peng — like many other Chinese — could not help herself and acted in a way that, to paraphrase the Chinese refrain, “hurt the feelings of the Taiwanese people.”
Rather than celebrate a successful collaboration, Peng repressed a Taiwanese and clearly showed that, in Beijing’s view, the relationship across the Taiwan Strait, no matter how much it improves, will never be one of equals. Chinese treatment of other minorities, such as Tibetans and Uighurs, is proof that “Han Chinese” will always be primus inter pares, a fate that equally applies to Taiwan and Hong Kong and that will only highlight and exacerbate the differences that exist between those peoples.
Hubris, above all, is characterized by self-defeating behavior, and China is well on its way to refining the art.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS