Taking pride in eco-diversity
In a recent Taipei Times article, artist Jane Ingram Allen made a noteworthy comment about how people living near the Chenglong Wetlands have changed their attitude toward the protection of the area: “When I first came here, [the villagers] saw the wetlands only as a bad thing … but now it is very popular … and people come to watch them. They are feeling more pride in their own place.” (“Art on the marsh,” May 4, page 12).
Only recently have conservationists around the world realized that a sense of pride may be an underused tool in preserving endangered species and ecosystems.
For a long time, conservationists focused on two other arguments to convince people to protect irreplaceable species and ecosystems: intrinsic and monetary values.
Intrinsic values emphasize that plants and animals enrich our lives by providing educational, intellectual and recreational opportunities, aesthetic and spiritual enjoyment and a sense of identity.
A healthy environment is thus fundamental to a good life. Conservation and sustainable biodiversity thus becomes an ethical issue of moral conduct toward other life forms and in relation to fellow human beings and cultures.
On the other hand, monetary values were summarized under the clunky term of “ecosystem services,” but despite that ecosystems provide more wealth for free than the entire human economy produces (“The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital,” Nature, Vol. 387, pages 253-260), not much progress has been made in convincing either local people or decisionmakers that conservation is a worthwhile exercise.
Enter pride. In many localities around the world, conservationists have been teaching people that their local wildlife species are unique and exist nowhere else — a fact which often came as a total surprise to people.
Awareness through education has led people to take pride in what had suddenly become something special.
Taiwanese conservationists are also increasingly using education and pride to rescue species from possible extinction. After the sad news that the clouded leopard is almost certainly extinct in Taiwan (“Formosan leopard extinct: zoologists,” May 1, page 4), the same team of conservationists are now focusing on saving a much smaller leopard cat from a similar fate.
Part of this effort is to make the leopard cat a mascot for Miaoli County. By adopting the leopard cat as a mascot, local knowledge and pride are improved, and eventually some money may be generated via eco-tourism.
Too much of Taiwan already looks like any other urban or rural development in the world: faceless concrete buildings and highways, global chains like McDonald’s and Starbucks, monotonous and lifeless plantations. It is high time that we take pride in what makes Taiwan unique — that which is irreplaceable.
Just like Longshan Temple and the Palace Museum protect the unique cultural heritage of Taiwan, protecting the white dolphin, blue magpie or leopard cat should not be seen as an impediment to ultimately self-destructive economic growth, but as a proud symbol of protecting what makes this nation unique and beautiful.
Flora Faun
Taipei
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS