Talks about the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) have finally restarted. Although the government has taken a defensive approach on the importation of US pork, ground beef and innards, most farmers are worried and doubt that it will be able to stick to its guns.
Amid these concerns, government officials have become more careful when making official statements on the issue. Until it has gathered and integrated all opinions by different government departments and established complementary measures to reach a consensus with farmers, the government is wary of making any threatening statement or floating any ideas to test public reaction for fear of getting burned.
Data show that in 2011, Taiwan imported 24,744 tonnes of US pork, accounting for more than 30 percent of the nation’s total pork imports.
Domestic opposition to the import of US pork containing leanness-enhancing additives stems in part from public health concerns given that Taiwanese are under greater risk than Westerners because of their predilection for eating pigs’ innards.
One other more important reason is imports of large volumes of cheaper US pork would have a big impact on the domestic livestock industry and the economy of agricultural villages — with the cost of raising one pig 1.8 times higher in Taiwan than that in the US. This would have affect a NT$100 billion (US$3.35 billion) industry, as well as the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of people.
One cannot just write off the resulting social commotion by saying that it is simply a matter of “give and take.”
For safety reasons, Taiwanese officials should cite differences in eating habits and demand that the US provide studies by health experts specifying the amount of ractopamine residues in different parts of the pig and their effect on Asian people and specific groups, such as pregnant women, people with cardiovascular disease, or infants and small children. They cannot just brush the issue aside by saying that since Americans can eat it, Taiwanese have nothing to fear.
The government has also been using the media to spread the idea that unless a deal is reached on US pork, there would be no TIFA nor Trans-Pacific Partnership. This is the same strategy that the administration used in the debate over US beef imports and which it is now using to justify continued construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市).
However, after the twin hikes in fuel and electricity prices and the signing of the cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), and with public satisfaction with and trust in government at an all-time low, it is questionable that playing the “economic card” again would resonate with the public.
It seems that the government has oversimplified the complexity of international trade talks and the highly technical skills such talks require. At a time when hog farmers are worried that the industry might collapse and the economy continues to stagnate, it seems government officials are lacking in sincerity and generosity.
If allowing imports of US pork containing leanness-enhancing additives would guarantee accession to the TPP, the government should be straightforward about it and inform the public.
It should also promise that it would use the economic benefits — which could be calculated with the help of economic models — derived from the accession to make up for the losses sustained by hog farmers by offering to help them upgrade their production facilities and set up certification and testing system to guarantee the safety of domestically produced pork and pigs’ innards.
It could also set up different distribution channels to separate US pork from domestic pork. At the same time, it should promote locally produced food products and encourage consumers to buy local produce, as well as offer ways for farmers who want to exit the industry. Above all, these pledges should be enshrined in law to prevent the government from going back on its word.
From the perspective of industrial sustainability, it would not be appropriate to rush forward and allow US pork imports at the current stage. However, following changes in the general environment, such as trade liberalization, increased green gas emissions, changes in consumption patterns, population increases, water shortages and rapid agricultural development in other countries, it has become imperative for Taiwan to implement major structural adjustments to its agricultural industry. The government should use this as an opportunity to respond to such changes, by actively promoting green energy agriculture and zero-pollution hog farming.
Although the domestic hog farming industry is bigger than other types of livestock farming, it is still made up mostly of small and medium-sized farms that are vulnerable to fluctuations in feed and hog prices. Taiwanese hog farms cannot compete with farms overseas that usually have more than 10,000 pigs.
In addition, the waste and polluted water generated by such farms has a negative impact on the environment. All these issues are areas in which the government should offer guidance and improvements. How to make Taiwanese agriculture strong enough to respond to the impact of market opening and deregulation that could follow from international trade talks is more urgent than an all-out effort to prevent market opening altogether.
Du Yu is a member of the Chen-Li task force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS