Turkey has been accused of cultural chauvinism and attempting to blackmail some of the world’s most important museums in the wake of its demands for the return of thousands of archeological treasures.
According to cultural bosses in Berlin, Paris and New York, Turkey has threatened to bar foreign archeologists from excavation sites in the country by not renewing their digging permits if governments refuse to return artifacts that Ankara says were unlawfully removed from Turkish soil. It has also threatened to halt the lending of its treasures to foreign museums, they say.
The government in Ankara, emboldened by the country’s growing diplomatic and economic clout, has repeatedly said that the retrieval of the artifacts is part of a policy it intends to pursue for years, if necessary, calling it a “cultural war.” However, it denies withholding permits as a form of leverage.
The German Archeological Institute, founded in 1829 and responsible for some of Turkey’s most important excavation sites, says it has already felt the wrath of the Turkish authorities, after they threatened to withdraw excavation permits unless a huge 3,300-year-old Hittite sphinx was returned. When the sphinx arrived in Turkey to much fanfare last year, permits for reconditioning and restoration work were renewed, but those for digging remained outstanding.
Hermann Parzinger, president of the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation in Berlin, which among other collections oversees the city’s Pergamon Museum, has accused Turkey of “playing a nasty game of politics” and of “threatening the future” of scientific work and other collaborations.
“The Turks are engaging in a rather aggressive style of politics,” he said. “They are trying to blackmail us and others by pushing foreign archeologists out. Their new tactic is to accuse us of not investing enough in the infrastructure of the digs.”
Since the return of the sphinx — which Parzinger insists Germany did as a gesture of goodwill despite being under no legal obligation to do so — Turkey has demanded that three further objects be handed over by the Pergamon. They are the more than 2,000-year-old marble torso from the old fisherman statue found in Hadrianic baths of Aphrodisias, a medieval gravestone and parts of a 13th-century mihrab (prayer niche) from Konya.
“All the artifacts were acquired legally more than a century ago and we are under no legal obligation to return them,” Parzinger said.
Turkey is also in dispute with the Louvre in Paris, which has refused requests to return objects. Ankara retaliated two years ago with a ban on French archeologists digging in Turkey.
Turkish officials are also at loggerheads with the Norbert Schimmel collection at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York over 18 objects they claim were illegally excavated, and with the British Museum in London over the Samsat Stele, a basalt slab from the 1st century BC.
Ankara says it only wants back what rightfully belongs to Turkey.
Turkish Minister of Culture and Tourism Ertugrul Gunay said 4,067 artifacts were returned from 2002 to last year. He said Ankara’s demands coincided with a new-found pride in the country’s cultural heritage.
“Our museum inventory is now on a par with that of European museums,” Gunay said recently. “The times when we simply exhibited artifacts in cupboards is over. We have caught up — what we have taken back is only a very small part of what we will take back.”
He added that over the past five years, Turkey had “spent more on history” than any other European country.
Turkey is gearing itself up for the opening in 2023 — the centenary of the founding of the Turkish Republic — of the 2.5 hectare Museum of Civilizations in Ankara, which is due to showcase many of Turkey’s best cultural treasures.
However, archeologists working in Turkey point to what they say is a sharp contradiction between the government’s zealous attempts to retrieve artifacts and its apparent negligence toward valuable excavation sites that are the talk of the archeological world.
Among the most prominent is Allianoi, a Roman bath and spa complex in Izmir Province, which was flooded in February 2011 on the orders of the government after the Yortanli Dam was constructed.
“Allianoi was destroyed despite our efforts to save the baths. The government preferred profit over the preservation of such an important heritage site,” said Ahmet Yaras, an archeologist at Thrace University.
Yaras, who spearheaded the efforts to save the archeological site, has been refused a digging permit for the past three years.
“It feels like I’m being punished by the Turkish government because I tried to save Allianoi,” he said.
The eastern garrison town of Zeugma from 300 BC is another historical site lost to the waters of a large dam project. Hasankeyf, a bronze-age town on the banks of the Tigris, is awaiting a similar fate.
In the central Anatolian town of Konya, the 5,000-year-old Askar Hoyuk burial ground was recently covered over with concrete and turned into a recreational area.
At Yenikapi, where a Byzantine harbor and 8,000-year-old human remains were found, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan recently outraged the archeological community by ordering the excavation there to come to a rapid end as it was holding up construction of the prestigious Marmaray tunnel underneath the Bosphorus, which is aimed at easing traffic congestion in Istanbul.
A Turkish archeologist, who did not want to be named, said he was heartbroken that the government appeared to be destroying sites at the same time as battling for the return of artifacts.
“I don’t understand the attitude of the government,” he said. “This contradiction is truly mind-boggling.”
“Of course, [the Turkish government] has the right to demand the return of certain artifacts, but they should never try to do this by threatening foreign excavation sites,” he added. “One thing should not be confused with the other.”
Asked if he felt Turkey had, if not a moral claim then a legal one, on the return of certain treasures, Parzinger said: “You have to understand that it was right at the time to bring these objects [to Germany] in order to protect them, but the times have since changed.”
The Pergamon altar, which is one of the most popular tourist attractions in Berlin, was narrowly saved from destruction in the 1860s by the German engineer, architect and archeologist Carl Humann.
“Many believe that the Pergamon altar stood in the Anatolian sun until the Germans dragged it away,” Parzinger said. “But the truth is that Humann had watched in horror as reliefs were being loaded into lime kilns … on the basis of contracts made according to the law governing antiques at the time, it was arranged for the reliefs to be brought to Berlin and so it was saved.”
He said that while the Turkish authorities had discussed requesting the return of the altar, Berlin had never received an official request.
Before 1945, the most widely spoken language in Taiwan was Tai-gi (also known as Taiwanese, Taiwanese Hokkien or Hoklo). However, due to almost a century of language repression policies, many Taiwanese believe that Tai-gi is at risk of disappearing. To understand this crisis, I interviewed academics and activists about Taiwan’s history of language repression, the major challenges of revitalizing Tai-gi and their policy recommendations. Although Taiwanese were pressured to speak Japanese when Taiwan became a Japanese colony in 1895, most managed to keep their heritage languages alive in their homes. However, starting in 1949, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) enacted martial law
“Si ambulat loquitur tetrissitatque sicut anas, anas est” is, in customary international law, the three-part test of anatine ambulation, articulation and tetrissitation. And it is essential to Taiwan’s existence. Apocryphally, it can be traced as far back as Suetonius (蘇埃托尼烏斯) in late first-century Rome. Alas, Suetonius was only talking about ducks (anas). But this self-evident principle was codified as a four-part test at the Montevideo Convention in 1934, to which the United States is a party. Article One: “The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: a) a permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) government;
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
Chinese agents often target Taiwanese officials who are motivated by financial gain rather than ideology, while people who are found guilty of spying face lenient punishments in Taiwan, a researcher said on Tuesday. While the law says that foreign agents can be sentenced to death, people who are convicted of spying for Beijing often serve less than nine months in prison because Taiwan does not formally recognize China as a foreign nation, Institute for National Defense and Security Research fellow Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) said. Many officials and military personnel sell information to China believing it to be of little value, unaware that
RSS