Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party scored a landslide victory in general elections earlier this month, and Shinzo Abe was elected prime minister by the lower house of parliament on Wednesday. Meanwhile Park Geun-hye won the presidential election in South Korea on Dec. 19.
These two events mark a clear turn to the right in East Asia’s political climate. The political background behind these changes is connected to the militarism in China and North Korea: It was on the one hand because the people in both countries feel that they need a strong government to protect their security, and on the other, a response to the US’ return to Asia.
Earlier this month, I took part in a conference in Tokyo on the promotion of democracy in Asia. The conference also marked the 60th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Japan and India. It showed that current strategic thinking in both government and opposition in Japan is that the democratic forces in Asia should unite to counterbalance the military threats posed by authoritarian governments.
Tibetans, Uighurs, Mongolians from Inner Mongolia, North Koreans, Vietnamese and the minorities in Myanmar still live under dictatorial rule, so why did Taiwan participate in the aforementioned conference?
It seems the organizers think Taiwan remains under the threat of annexation by the autocratic Chinese government and that Taiwanese democracy remains seriously flawed as the specter of authoritarianism still looms.
Regardless of any criticism launched at the administration of US President Barack Obama, I am strongly in favor of his shift toward Asia.
In particular, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has worked hard to promote this policy, and after Obama’s re-election, he promptly visited Myanmar, Cambodia and Thailand as part of an attempt to stop China’s influence continuing to spread south. The question is whether the pro-Chinese John Kerry, recently nominated by Obama as Clinton’s successor, will abandon this policy once he takes over the post.
After giving a lecture on China under Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a Taiwan studies forum in Tokyo on Dec. 9, I jokingly told my Taiwanese and Japanese friends that my wife and I had returned to Asia from the US before Obama did.
At the time, this was not a pronounced awareness, it was more of a feeling that Taiwan was in crisis and a disagreement with then-US president George W. Bush’s decision to concentrate his military forces in the Middle East, appease China and North Korea and ignore Taiwan’s strategic position.
If we look around the world today, it is clear that China is the biggest autocracy. It is also the support behind North Korea and many other smaller dictatorships.
North Korea has been able to obtain nuclear weapons and missiles because the US believes China will be able to control it and that the two will not start to cooperate in an attempt to achieve their own ends. North Korea’s recent test firing of a rocket just serves to further drive this point home.
Still the international media continue to report that North Korean leader Kim Jong-un intends to implement reform and opening up.
When the Japanese economy took off in the past, there was no talk about any “Japanese threat” because Japan is a democracy.
However, China is constantly clamoring for war and sending its fleet out to demonstrate its power. This is a cause for fear in many countries and explains why Asian countries are welcoming the US’ return to Asia.
Western countries are not opposed to China’s rise, but they do oppose any moves toward fascist militarism that threatens regional stability and world peace.
The US’ pivot to Asia is not only a matter of the return of military force.
Even more important is the strategic confrontation between democracies and autocracies. This is not only a matter of military confrontation, it is also a matter of confrontation between ideologies, an attempt to bring about reform in China and make it accept universal values to avoid war.
Over the past year, Western countries have helped the Chinese Communist Party defeat Bo Xilai’s (薄熙來) attempt to take China down the road toward fascism. Next year, the US should use its supervision of illegal funds to help China combat corruption and ferret out the most corrupt and reactionary privileged groups in order to eliminate the opposition to reform.
This is the kind of interference in domestic politics that would not meet with disapproval from the Chinese public, and would help defeat radical Chinese nationalism.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS