When a vote of no-confidence against Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) initiated by the pan-green camp failed to pass the legislature on Saturday, the Taiwan Solidarity Union caucuses threatened to impeach President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) if his administration has still failed to address major issues by May 20 next year.
The idea of a motion to impeach Ma, which would require a proposal approved by two-thirds of all lawmakers and 50 percent votes from the nation’s eligible voters to be passed, is more symbolic than substantial given the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) absolute majority in the legislature. However, the suggestion again reflects the public’s disapproval of the Ma administration’s performance. It is time the government stopped ignoring such warnings.
On Saturday, the KMT caucus managed to block the motion to depose the premier with 66 votes to 46 votes. The KMT’s pan-blue ally, the People First Party (PFP) caucus voted to support the motion because it blames Chen for failing to properly address economic issues.
Ma, who had appointed Chen, a finance expert, to boost the economy, has frequently touted the latest Cabinet as an “economic Cabinet.” He has defended its efforts to rescue the economy while blaming the global financial crisis for poor economic figures.
The problem is that both Ma and Chen have been passive in the face of public grievances about the harsh economic situations. The Ma administration has been unable to recognize the roots of the economic problems and suffers from a lack of action, poor cross-departmental negotiation skills as well as poor execution of government policies.
In the latest survey released by Taiwan Indicator Survey Research (TISR) earlier this month, Ma’s approval ratings remained at just 21.3 percent, with 69.6 percent of those polled saying they were not satisfied with Ma’s governance.
More than 40 percent of respondents said they “had no impression whatsoever” about the Cabinet’s performance. Economic and financial officials were among the least popular Cabinet members, with Minister of Economic Affairs Shih Yen-hsiang (施顏祥) holding the highest disapproval rating in the Cabinet at 42.2 percent, the survey showed.
The Ma administration seemed to be indifferent about the high disapproval rating. Prior to the legislature’s vote of no confidence, Ma partially reshuffled the Cabinet, appointing his close aides to top posts in cross-strait, foreign affairs and national security sectors. However, none of the officials in charge of the economy and finance were removed.
Saturday’s motion to depose Chen was only the nation’s second such vote after a motion of no confidence against former premier Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) in 1999. Although Siew also survived the motion, the public grievance against the then-KMT government remained high. The KMT later lost the 2000 presidential election to the DPP, with former Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) leading a peaceful transition of power from the KMT.
If the Ma administration continues to be impassive about these high disapproval ratings and views the opposition camp’s motions against them as nothing but political infighting, the KMT may well suffer defeat in the local elections in 2014. While Ma could avoid an impeachment next year, the people could vote against the KMT in the presidential election in 2016.
The public expects the government to present policies that address their needs and boost the economy and it should be a top priority for the Ma administration now to develop effective policies to raise the nation’s competitiveness. It is also crucial for the Cabinet to strengthen communications with the legislative branch to facilitate the implementation of government policies.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
US President Donald Trump’s administration on Friday last week announced it would impose sanctions on the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a vast paramilitary organization that is directly controlled by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and has been linked to human rights violations against Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The sanctions follow US travel bans against other Xinjiang officials and the passage of the US Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which authorizes targeted sanctions against mainland Chinese and Hong Kong officials, in response to Beijing’s imposition of national security legislation on the territory. The sanctions against the corps would be implemented
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose