It seems that the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee has finally, in what is formidable hindsight, discovered that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is not worth standing up for. Ma has no idea where he is, or what he is supposed to be doing.
Ma basks in the light of the image of incorruptibility he has fashioned for himself, and relies on this to absolve himself of all sins, such as the political incompetence of which he is often accused.
He takes great pride in this most fundamental of traits and insists everyone under him follows suit.
However, whether or not the officials under him are clean depends on their individual integrity, and even more so on legal sanctions.
Ma has evoked the poetry of Song Dynasty general Yue Fei (岳飛), who had “served the country with the utmost loyalty” (精忠報國) tattooed on his back to encourage them to fight corruption. This is patently ridiculous.
The Republic of China (ROC), which prides itself on being Asia’s first modern republic, has been around for a century, and yet Ma feels the need to travel 1,000 years back in time to find a model of incorruptibility in imperial China.
This really does not reflect very well on the ROC.
Apparently Ma, just like Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) before him, has a special place in his heart for old stories from feudal China.
You could often see tattoos on the arms of soldiers in Chiang’s army, including Yue Fei’s “serve the country with the utmost loyalty” and shazhu bamao (殺朱拔毛) — a play on words, inspired by an old saying, that basically meant killing People’s Liberation Army general Zhu De (朱德) and “plucking out” Chinese Communist Party (CCP) chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東).
However, you never saw any anti-corruption slogans.
Ma is always going on about fighting corruption.
His defense during his own corruption case in 2006 was based on his use of a special expense account modeled on the Song Dynasty gongshi money (公使錢) system, where generals would give out money to boost morale. Now he is bringing out stories from the Song dynasty 1,000 years ago. Will he also take a leaf out of Chiang’s book and order those under his command to have anti-corruption tattoos?
Whether Ma sees himself as president of a country or the governor of an administrative area, he is in public office and responsible for implementing the laws of the land.
The trouble is, he doesn’t really seem to understand what he is supposed to be doing.
On the much-delayed not guilty verdict of the Hsichih Trio, Ma merely said he “hoped” that such illegitimate extortion of confessions in criminal cases would never happen again.
This is like a child’s prayer, or a journalist’s closing observations. “Hope” is not a term that should be used by someone in public office, who is responsible for guaranteeing that such things do not happen again on their watch.
That being as it may, Ma should put his money where his mouth is and set up an inquiry into whether any confessions were extracted through force from former Chinatrust Financial Holding Co (中信金控) vice chairman Jeffrey Koo Jr (辜仲諒), coercing him into testifying against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) during the corruption case against him.
If he doesn’t take this upon himself, he should just leave office, don his shorts and go for a swim or a run, and not keep doing his country or its citizens wrong.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval