It seems that the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee has finally, in what is formidable hindsight, discovered that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is not worth standing up for. Ma has no idea where he is, or what he is supposed to be doing.
Ma basks in the light of the image of incorruptibility he has fashioned for himself, and relies on this to absolve himself of all sins, such as the political incompetence of which he is often accused.
He takes great pride in this most fundamental of traits and insists everyone under him follows suit.
However, whether or not the officials under him are clean depends on their individual integrity, and even more so on legal sanctions.
Ma has evoked the poetry of Song Dynasty general Yue Fei (岳飛), who had “served the country with the utmost loyalty” (精忠報國) tattooed on his back to encourage them to fight corruption. This is patently ridiculous.
The Republic of China (ROC), which prides itself on being Asia’s first modern republic, has been around for a century, and yet Ma feels the need to travel 1,000 years back in time to find a model of incorruptibility in imperial China.
This really does not reflect very well on the ROC.
Apparently Ma, just like Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) before him, has a special place in his heart for old stories from feudal China.
You could often see tattoos on the arms of soldiers in Chiang’s army, including Yue Fei’s “serve the country with the utmost loyalty” and shazhu bamao (殺朱拔毛) — a play on words, inspired by an old saying, that basically meant killing People’s Liberation Army general Zhu De (朱德) and “plucking out” Chinese Communist Party (CCP) chairman Mao Zedong (毛澤東).
However, you never saw any anti-corruption slogans.
Ma is always going on about fighting corruption.
His defense during his own corruption case in 2006 was based on his use of a special expense account modeled on the Song Dynasty gongshi money (公使錢) system, where generals would give out money to boost morale. Now he is bringing out stories from the Song dynasty 1,000 years ago. Will he also take a leaf out of Chiang’s book and order those under his command to have anti-corruption tattoos?
Whether Ma sees himself as president of a country or the governor of an administrative area, he is in public office and responsible for implementing the laws of the land.
The trouble is, he doesn’t really seem to understand what he is supposed to be doing.
On the much-delayed not guilty verdict of the Hsichih Trio, Ma merely said he “hoped” that such illegitimate extortion of confessions in criminal cases would never happen again.
This is like a child’s prayer, or a journalist’s closing observations. “Hope” is not a term that should be used by someone in public office, who is responsible for guaranteeing that such things do not happen again on their watch.
That being as it may, Ma should put his money where his mouth is and set up an inquiry into whether any confessions were extracted through force from former Chinatrust Financial Holding Co (中信金控) vice chairman Jeffrey Koo Jr (辜仲諒), coercing him into testifying against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) during the corruption case against him.
If he doesn’t take this upon himself, he should just leave office, don his shorts and go for a swim or a run, and not keep doing his country or its citizens wrong.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS