It appears that the government does not operate efficiently enough to prevent the further deterioration of an already dire economic situation. The Cabinet said on Saturday that it would take one month to come up with stimulus packages substantial enough to lure investment from overseas Taiwanese businesspeople.
The timetable was unveiled about three weeks after the Cabinet launched a series of economic forums in an attempt to produce effective measures to boost the economy and get it back on track.
There is disagreement within the government, including divisions over issues such as relaxing hiring regulation for foreign laborers. Unfortunately, it is this labor issue that looks like the only factor that would motivate overseas Taiwanese entrepreneurs since there are no tax incentives or subsidies on offer.
With only three months left to the year’s end, it is unlikely that whatever stimulus plan is devised will help boost GDP growth this year. The government expected GDP to expand at an annual rate of 1.66 percent this year — an unrealistic forecast given the continuing weakness in the eurozone and emerging markets, primarily China. Credit Suisse projected Taiwan’s GDP would grow by just 1 percent this year, the lowest forecast among its peers.
The government’s inertia may sound like nothing new for most people. However, this time it goes too far — these are the crucial moments in determining an escape from economic recession. The government ignored the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) warning in December last year, that compared with South Korea, Taiwan would suffer more from the eurozone’s debt crisis. At the time, the ADB expected Taiwan’s economy to grow at annual rate of 2 percent this year, falling behind South Korea’s 2.5 percent.
The impact from the eurozone’s debt crisis has been underestimated by the government. While only 10 percent of Taiwan’s exports go directly to Europe, a much larger chunk go via China, where Taiwanese companies can have components assembled cheaply. In other words, Europe accounts for a much bigger portion of Taiwan’s exports than the government realizes.
The South Korean government took the ADB’s warning seriously and started countermeasures. About five months ago, Seoul introduced new measures, including tax breaks, to encourage South Korean firms with operations overseas to make domestic investments. Since it implemented the new policies in April, Seoul has attracted 14 companies planning to invest 73 billion won (US$64 million) as a result of the latest announcement from South Korea’s Ministry of Knowledge Economy. The new investments would create more than 3,000 jobs, the ministry said. The investments do not look impressive yet, but Seoul’s efforts will start paying GDP dividends this year. Seoul’s investment stimulus packages took effect when the country still enjoyed resilient 2.8 percent annual GDP growth in the first quarter, while Taiwan’s economy expanded just 0.8 percent during the same period.
The Cabinet began its emergency forums three weeks ago after Taiwan’s economy drifted into its first annual economic contraction of 0.18 percent in almost three years in the second quarter. That forced the government to face the harsh reality that the economy would not grow 3 percent, or even 2 percent.
In another major effort to help the economy, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said it would selectively help local, small and medium-sized enterprises to export more goods and help them enhance their global competitiveness. No tax incentives or capital injections would be involved, officials said, citing tight budgetary constraints.
It seems impossible to expect the economy to improve this year. Perhaps Taiwan can look forward to a better economy next year, but it could be even worse.
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Taiwan’s labor force participation rate among people aged 65 or older was only 9.9 percent for 2023 — far lower than in other advanced countries, Ministry of Labor data showed. The rate is 38.3 percent in South Korea, 25.7 percent in Japan and 31.5 percent in Singapore. On the surface, it might look good that more older adults in Taiwan can retire, but in reality, it reflects policies that make it difficult for elderly people to participate in the labor market. Most workplaces lack age-friendly environments, and few offer retraining programs or flexible job arrangements for employees older than 55. As
RSS