It appears that the government does not operate efficiently enough to prevent the further deterioration of an already dire economic situation. The Cabinet said on Saturday that it would take one month to come up with stimulus packages substantial enough to lure investment from overseas Taiwanese businesspeople.
The timetable was unveiled about three weeks after the Cabinet launched a series of economic forums in an attempt to produce effective measures to boost the economy and get it back on track.
There is disagreement within the government, including divisions over issues such as relaxing hiring regulation for foreign laborers. Unfortunately, it is this labor issue that looks like the only factor that would motivate overseas Taiwanese entrepreneurs since there are no tax incentives or subsidies on offer.
With only three months left to the year’s end, it is unlikely that whatever stimulus plan is devised will help boost GDP growth this year. The government expected GDP to expand at an annual rate of 1.66 percent this year — an unrealistic forecast given the continuing weakness in the eurozone and emerging markets, primarily China. Credit Suisse projected Taiwan’s GDP would grow by just 1 percent this year, the lowest forecast among its peers.
The government’s inertia may sound like nothing new for most people. However, this time it goes too far — these are the crucial moments in determining an escape from economic recession. The government ignored the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) warning in December last year, that compared with South Korea, Taiwan would suffer more from the eurozone’s debt crisis. At the time, the ADB expected Taiwan’s economy to grow at annual rate of 2 percent this year, falling behind South Korea’s 2.5 percent.
The impact from the eurozone’s debt crisis has been underestimated by the government. While only 10 percent of Taiwan’s exports go directly to Europe, a much larger chunk go via China, where Taiwanese companies can have components assembled cheaply. In other words, Europe accounts for a much bigger portion of Taiwan’s exports than the government realizes.
The South Korean government took the ADB’s warning seriously and started countermeasures. About five months ago, Seoul introduced new measures, including tax breaks, to encourage South Korean firms with operations overseas to make domestic investments. Since it implemented the new policies in April, Seoul has attracted 14 companies planning to invest 73 billion won (US$64 million) as a result of the latest announcement from South Korea’s Ministry of Knowledge Economy. The new investments would create more than 3,000 jobs, the ministry said. The investments do not look impressive yet, but Seoul’s efforts will start paying GDP dividends this year. Seoul’s investment stimulus packages took effect when the country still enjoyed resilient 2.8 percent annual GDP growth in the first quarter, while Taiwan’s economy expanded just 0.8 percent during the same period.
The Cabinet began its emergency forums three weeks ago after Taiwan’s economy drifted into its first annual economic contraction of 0.18 percent in almost three years in the second quarter. That forced the government to face the harsh reality that the economy would not grow 3 percent, or even 2 percent.
In another major effort to help the economy, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said it would selectively help local, small and medium-sized enterprises to export more goods and help them enhance their global competitiveness. No tax incentives or capital injections would be involved, officials said, citing tight budgetary constraints.
It seems impossible to expect the economy to improve this year. Perhaps Taiwan can look forward to a better economy next year, but it could be even worse.
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Swiftly following the conclusion of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) China trip, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office unveiled 10 new policy measures for Taiwan. The measures, covering youth exchanges, agricultural and fishery imports, resumption of certain flights and cultural and media cooperation, appear to offer “incentives” for cross-strait engagement. However, viewed within the political context, their significance lies not in promoting exchanges but in redefining who is qualified to represent Taiwan in dialogue with China. First, the policy statement proposes a “normalized communication mechanism” between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). This would shift cross-strait interaction from
RSS