On Wednesday last week, the Institute of Economics at Academia Sinica adjusted its economic growth forecast for this year downward to 1.94 percent, from its previous forecast of 3.8 percent. The new forecast is reasonable, because for the first half of the year economic growth fell to minus-0.5 percent and export growth fell to minus-4.74 percent, making Taiwan the only country among our trading partners to experience a drop. Especially worthy of note is the fact that exports to China decreased by 8.82 percent, almost twice as much as for total exports. This is indeed very strange: How can this happen after we were blessed with the great Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA)?
The answer to this question is common sense. All we need do is ask how there can be any exports left at all given that every link in the supply chain — downsteam, mid-stream and upstream — has moved to China. This is the same reason why throughput at Greater Kaohsiung Port has fallen each year for the past decade.
It is only natural that the government feels duty-bound to defend its policy mistakes. It has tried to blame them on the European debt crisis, slowing economic growth in China and the weak US economy. However, the real question is why Taiwan’s economy is slowing so much more than other countries? Over the past four years, whether in terms of economic growth or the stock market, Taiwan has failed to do as well as other countries when things are going well and has done much worse when things have been going badly.
The government’s explanation is that exports are too focused on China and industrial development is preoccupied with the high-tech industry and that this has resulted in an imbalance. If this was true, why did Taiwan’s economy not perform better in the past few years when China’s economy enjoyed double-digit growth? And why did the Taiwanese economy do worse than others in the 2000s, the glory years of the technology industry boom?
Such explanations are clearly excuses. The real reason, and this is something to which the government will never admit, is the mistaken focus of the nation’s leaders on China when it comes to economic development.
Taiwan’s failure to perform as well as other countries is a sign of the nation’s economic marginalization and an inevitable result of linking too closely to the Chinese economy. Not even the ECFA concessions that Beijing has promised can make up for the downside of the increasingly close relationship with China.
Pro-unification media do not agree that integration with China will result in Taiwan’s economic marginalization and they refute these arguments by saying that none of the other countries clamoring to develop relations with China have been marginalized.
However, for countries like South Korea and Japan, China is a foreign country with a different language and culture. That is not true for Taiwan, as there are no linguistic or major cultural differences between us and China. There is also a huge difference in size and geographical proximity. The big markets in China therefore have a much stronger pull on Taiwan than on other countries. As testament to this fact, Taiwanese businesspeople have pumped about US$500 billion in investments into China and about 1 million Taiwanese work there.
Excessive investment in China and the rapid linking of the two nations’ economies have caused a major drop in domestic investment. This has slowed down industrial upgrading and is ultimately responsible for a Taiwan’s loss of global competitiveness.
If the nation’s leaders refuse to admit integration with China is wrong because of their biased understanding and therefore fail to adopt corrective policies as soon as possible, Taiwan’s situation is only going to get worse.
Huang Tien-lin is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Drew Cameron
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his