“Are prosecutors really probing the case?”
This is a question that is likely to be on many people’s minds in light of the investigation into corruption charges against former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世).
Lingering pessimism among members of the public is clear from a recent survey in which 63.4 percent of respondents said they have no confidence in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) promises to crack down on corrupt officials, or to probe corruption scandals involving state-run companies. The survey, conducted by Taiwan Indicators Survey Research, showed a mere 26.8 percent believed in Ma’s ability to promote “clean government.”
The skeptics have their reasons to doubt the Special Investigation Division’s (SID) determination to get to the bottom of the alleged corruption scandal as days turn into weeks since the allegations about Lin first erupted into public view on June 27. It appears prosecutors are still dragging their feet.
Granted, State Prosecutor-General Huang Shyh-ming (黃世銘) on Monday stated that there would be no limit to the investigation into the corruption charges against Lin. However, many cannot help but wonder whether the pace of the investigation means investigators might reach a dead end before they get their hands on any damning evidence.
The SID already raised eyebrows after it was reported last week that Chen Chi-hsiang (陳啟祥), head of Ti Yung Co and the key suspect who has accused Lin of accepting a bribe of NT$63 million (US$2.15 million) in 2010 and then asking for a further NT$83 million last year, had turned himself in to the SID before the Chinese-language Next Magazine published Chen’s allegations against Lin on June 27. The revelation ran contrary to the SID’s initial claim that it only learned about Chen and his allegations after the issue hit the newsstands.
The SID then again drew curious glances as it was seen half-heartedly starting its investigation. It did not summon Lin for questioning until July 1 — three days after the allegations against him first surfaced — prompting speculation that a 72-hour window had given plenty of time to dispose of incriminating evidence.
The latest chapter in the saga was yesterday’s report in Next Magazine accusing Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) of playing a role in the alleged corruption. This came on top of claims on Monday by TV commentator Hu Chung-hsin (胡忠信) on a political talk show that he had received tips from an informer claiming that another high-ranking official might also be involved in the case of alleged corruption, many cannot help but wonder why it is that outside parties such as media outlets and media figures appear to know more about the case than the SID does.
All these doubts demonstrate people’s lack of confidence in the SID and their doubt over its political neutrality.
The SID should take this case as an opportunity to prove the doubters wrong. It can only be hoped that the SID’s performance will exceed people’s expectations and restore the public’s confidence in the nation’s justice system.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS