“Are prosecutors really probing the case?”
This is a question that is likely to be on many people’s minds in light of the investigation into corruption charges against former Executive Yuan secretary-general Lin Yi-shih (林益世).
Lingering pessimism among members of the public is clear from a recent survey in which 63.4 percent of respondents said they have no confidence in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) promises to crack down on corrupt officials, or to probe corruption scandals involving state-run companies. The survey, conducted by Taiwan Indicators Survey Research, showed a mere 26.8 percent believed in Ma’s ability to promote “clean government.”
The skeptics have their reasons to doubt the Special Investigation Division’s (SID) determination to get to the bottom of the alleged corruption scandal as days turn into weeks since the allegations about Lin first erupted into public view on June 27. It appears prosecutors are still dragging their feet.
Granted, State Prosecutor-General Huang Shyh-ming (黃世銘) on Monday stated that there would be no limit to the investigation into the corruption charges against Lin. However, many cannot help but wonder whether the pace of the investigation means investigators might reach a dead end before they get their hands on any damning evidence.
The SID already raised eyebrows after it was reported last week that Chen Chi-hsiang (陳啟祥), head of Ti Yung Co and the key suspect who has accused Lin of accepting a bribe of NT$63 million (US$2.15 million) in 2010 and then asking for a further NT$83 million last year, had turned himself in to the SID before the Chinese-language Next Magazine published Chen’s allegations against Lin on June 27. The revelation ran contrary to the SID’s initial claim that it only learned about Chen and his allegations after the issue hit the newsstands.
The SID then again drew curious glances as it was seen half-heartedly starting its investigation. It did not summon Lin for questioning until July 1 — three days after the allegations against him first surfaced — prompting speculation that a 72-hour window had given plenty of time to dispose of incriminating evidence.
The latest chapter in the saga was yesterday’s report in Next Magazine accusing Vice President Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) of playing a role in the alleged corruption. This came on top of claims on Monday by TV commentator Hu Chung-hsin (胡忠信) on a political talk show that he had received tips from an informer claiming that another high-ranking official might also be involved in the case of alleged corruption, many cannot help but wonder why it is that outside parties such as media outlets and media figures appear to know more about the case than the SID does.
All these doubts demonstrate people’s lack of confidence in the SID and their doubt over its political neutrality.
The SID should take this case as an opportunity to prove the doubters wrong. It can only be hoped that the SID’s performance will exceed people’s expectations and restore the public’s confidence in the nation’s justice system.
The Jumbo Floating Restaurant was a landmark in Hong Kong for nearly half a century. The palatial restaurant, with its pastiche Chinese architecture and neon lights perfectly encapsulated the territory’s beguiling balance of East and West, tradition and modernity. It was a feature backdrop in numerous Hong Kong films. However, forced to close amid the stringent COVID-19 lockdown policies of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) and denied financial support from her government, the floating temple to Cantonese gastronomy was towed from its mooring in Aberdeen Harbour this month by its owners with its planned destination not released. On June
Ned Price, spokesperson of the United States Department of State, is a Twitter influencer at the exalted “celebrity/macro” rank. So, even though it was well after working hours on Friday evening, May 20, 2022 — as Secretary of State Antony Blinken prepared for President Biden’s first presidential trip to Asia — Ned Price was sure of an audience as he “tweeted” the following message: “The PRC continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy. The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act,
Opinion polls show that Taiwan’s judicial system and law enforcement “enjoy” low approval ratings among Taiwanese. In spite of data showing low crime rates, many Taiwanese drivers have faced aggressive driving, unprovoked road rage, road blocking and unmotivated police officers. Some criminals seem to consider themselves above the law, which is not completely wrong. Reports about so-called “road blocking” can be found in newspapers or on YouTube. An example of this is when “road rowdies” block a vehicle on a road, get out of their vehicle and start to attack the occupants of the blocked vehicle — often attacking in a
An April circular by the Chinese Ministry of Education on student admission criteria at Tibetan universities has been harrowing and discriminating to say the least. The circular said that prospective students must state their “political attitude and ideological morality” to be considered for admission. It also said that students should not be involved in religious movements and students who are proficient in Marxist theory should be preferred. Since Beijing started occupying Tibet, it has meticulously introduced policies to dismantle the Tibetan education system, which is closely tied to its rich monastic tradition, and has even pulled students from Afghanistan and eastern
RSS