In the latest shake-up in the global DRAM industry, it is evident that Taiwanese firms are reduced to playing a marginal role.
Specifically, local firms that survived a severe industrial slump have wound up as bench players on Micron Technology’s team to challenge industry leader Samsung Electronics, following Micron’s announcement on Monday last week that it had clinched a US$2.5 billion deal to buy out beleaguered Elpida Memory.
At the same time, the US memory chip-maker offered to buy a 24 percent share of Rexchip Electronics Corp from Taiwan’s Powerchip Technology Corp for US$334 million, to complete is acquisition of Elpida. Rexchip is a DRAM venture formed by Powerchip and Elpida in 2006. That makes Nanya Technology the sole DRAM chip-maker fully owned by Taiwanese.
Certainly, Micron will be the biggest beneficiary from the acquisition, as its market position will jump to No. 2 from fourth place following the transaction, giving the US firm a greater influence over the DRAM market. The deal will also raise the chance for Micron to win mobile DRAM orders from Apple, as it could integrate its flash memory chips with Elpida’s mobile memory, local market researcher TrendForce Corp said.
Scant benefits can be found, at least in this initial stage, for Micron’s local partners.
However, some patriotic reporters have hyped the potential of technology transfer and business growth through this US-Japan-Taiwan camp tie-up and its competition with the South Korean camp. They are wrong.
First, no change in market share will be seen for local DRAM chipmakers in the short term. Nanya Technology, which will stick to its 4.5 percent share, has its lips sealed about a potential collaboration with Micron.
“Our partnership with Micron is intact,” Nanya Technology vice president Pai Pei-lin (白培霖) said.
The collaboration between Nanya Technology and Micron is only in the DRAM area. The two companies agree to develop next-generation technologies to make cost-effective DRAM chips and share Inotera’s capacities. That is it for now.
Second, Powerchip, Elpida’s local partner, will see its market position weakened after selling its Rexchip stake and will transform into a contract chipmaker like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co, rather than a memory chipmaker.
Powertech, which supplies memory chip testing services for Elpida, is facing a long-term risk of a decrease in orders since Micron usually does more of its testing in-house after acquisitions, Credit Suisse said in a report.
There will be a benefit, of course. As the world’s DRAM market will be dominant by the big three — Samsung, Micron and Hynix Semiconductor — there will be no crazy price cuts like last year’s annual 50 percent reduction.
As long as prices can remain steady, DRAM makers will have a bigger chance to make profits, ending several years in the red.
Shares of Nanya Technology edged up 0.8 percent on Monday last week, following Micron’s announcement. The deal also boosted stock price of Inotera up 3.06 percent to NT$7.08.
There might be no absolutely promising prospect for local DRAM chip suppliers. However, as long as they can face the fact that they have to work on their own, they can forge a road for themselves. Nanya Technology seems to have a clearer head than local media. It is diversifying as much as it can from commodity PC DRAM chip manufacturing amid falling demand for PCs after the rise of tablets and smartphones.
Nanya Technology, apparently, has not fallen into the misconception that relying on extra support
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
There are few areas where Beijing, Taipei, and Washington find themselves in agreement these days, but one of them is that the situation in the Taiwan Strait is growing more dangerous. Such a shared assessment quickly breaks down, though, when the question turns to identifying sources of rising tensions. Several Chinese experts and officials I have consulted with recently have argued that Beijing’s increasingly belligerent behavior in the Taiwan Strait is driven mostly by fear. According to this narrative, Beijing is worried that unless it puts a brake on Taiwan’s move away from the mainland, Taiwan could be “lost” forever. They
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) this week came under fire over his speech at a Rotary Club meeting in Taipei on Monday, when he said that Beijing’s military strategy toward Taiwan was “to let the first battle be the last.” If China started a cross-strait war, it would end quickly, without time for other nations to react, he said in his “Cross-Strait Relations and Taiwan Security” address, criticizing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for saying that she hoped other nations would come to Taiwan’s aid in Beijing’s first wave of attacks. A president should prevent war from happening, not talk about how