A shadow has been cast over Taiwan of late. In “one country, two areas (一國兩區),” President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has proposed a formula for our relationship with China tantamount to our relinquishing our national sovereignty. In insisting on easing a ban on importing meat containing ractopamine, he is disregarding public opinion and endangering public health. At the same time, the government has instigated price hikes in gasoline, electricity and even in health insurance premiums, which have significantly increased the cost of living. This government clearly cares little for the public.
Prior to the January presidential election, Ma promised things would get better if people voted for him. They haven’t gotten better, and it seems that, not having to face the electorate again, he feels free to oblige the public to grin and bear the situation he has engineered. The electorate might not agree with what he is doing, but voters can do little about it, which shows that flaws remain in Taiwan’s democratic system.
Perhaps the time has come to reform the system. When I say reform, I refer to one that will provide guarantees of life, subsistence and rights.
Over its history, Taiwan has been subjected to the rule of many different powers, something I have called the “tragedy of being born Taiwanese.” However, with the development of the democracy movement and with popular support, I, as president, was able to push for reform and, through a peaceful revolution, transfer political power to the hands of the public, making Taiwanese the true masters of their country. More work is still needed in judicial, educational and religious reforms, so that people can truely have a sense of being in control of their own fate. Reform brings a better quality of life; it doesn’t require that people have to endure tough times.
In the past, Taiwanese took to the streets to demand the right to vote and freedom of speech, not thinking of the risk to person and property. Now, the president is decided in direct elections and the reins of government have changed hands on two occasions. However, the momentum for reform seems to have been lost and politics has become more about furthering one’s own status and interests. The focus is no longer on improving the lives of ordinary people.
If Taiwan is to continue to progress, we need to rely on the public and on social movements: We can no longer look to the political parties. Indeed, there is no room for any party that works counter to the will of the public.
Taiwan still has many problems — political, economic and social — related to the constitutional government system, the effectiveness of the judiciary, social justice, the integrity of the press, environmental protection, land justice, public health, human rights and the care of the weak and the vulnerable.
For example, the stipulations in the opening paragraphs of the Additional Articles of the Republic of China Constitution that presuppose the goal of unification are out of touch with how the majority of Taiwanese think today; the allocation of legislative seats to members of the majority and minority political parties does not reflect the number of votes these parties actually obtain in the legislative elections, counter to the principle that all votes should have equal weighting; constitutional reform is entirely in the hands of the legislature; the public has to wade through many layers of red tape before it can initiate a referendum — a serious restriction of their ability to express their opinions; and the gap between the rich and poor continues to widen in an affront to fairness and justice. We need to undertake comprehensive reforms to set these issues right.
In the past, Taiwanese entrusted the government with the protection of their rights. People were busy getting on with living their own lives; they didn’t have time to concern themselves with the public good, and it was therefore impossible for them to unite into a movement for reform. I would like to remind all Taiwanese that rights have to be fought for — they do not grow on trees. The public needs to take the initiative, unite and push for more democratic reforms if Taiwanese are ever to truly have a say in how the country is run.
Taiwan has always been a vibrant place and Taiwanese a formidable bunch. At the moment, things may not be looking too positive and the wind has been taken out of their sails to a degree, but they haven’t lost their sense of social justice. Look at the public reaction to the government’s recent forced demolition of property belonging to the Wang family in Taipei’s Shilin District (士林), the support for Miaoli farmers subjected to forced land expropriation and the White Rose Movement born of frustration with out-of-touch “dinosaur” judges, all of which demonstrate the Taiwanese insistence on justice.
I would like to encourage the whole nation not to lose heart, to maintain their passion for their country, to keep their love for their land and compatriots, to remain confident in themselves and to push for more reform. We need to start from the unfairness and injustice that we see around us now, in the constitutional government system, the effectiveness of the judiciary, social justice and all of the things we have already mentioned. If the government is not prepared to introduce these reforms and the political parties don’t care, the public needs to stand up and adopt the same resolve it had before, to push for more democratic reforms and continue to fight for a bright future for Taiwan.
Lee Teng-hui is a former president of Taiwan.
Translated by Paul Cooper
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS