In a perfect world, China’s rise to power would be conducted peacefully and benefit not only itself, but its neighbors and the world at large. Pragmatic thinkers in China would prevail over their hawkish rivals and steer a course of cooperation — not confrontation — with the rest of the world, creating a win-win situation for everyone.
This is what many academics are again hoping for now that former Chinese Communist Party secretary of Chongqing and Cultural Revolution throwback Bo Xilai (薄熙來) has been toppled. They want a return to the good old days when everybody could make money in China and feel safe from Beijing making ridiculous demands on the rest of the world or military threats against its neighbors.
However, even without Bo around to sharpen the rhetoric, it seems unlikely that Beijing will return to an era of cooperation with the rest of the world, as Tamkang University professor Lin Chong-pin (林中斌) predicted in a recent analysis of Chinese diplomacy.
Lin is right that things have not gone so well for China diplomatically since it gave up on its good neighbor policy in 2009 to pursue its nationalist agenda in the region. The Philippines, Vietnam, Australia, the US, India and Japan all seem ready to gang up on China if it continues to throw its weight around in such a bellicose way.
It seems likely that leaders such as Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) and Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) know that, and are ready to put on a good face for a while to push forward China’s agenda without alarming the region.
The military hawks behind the new generation of smiling Chinese leaders will likely go along with this as long as they think it is necessary, or else they would not have allowed Bo to be pulled from his perch.
However, it is doubtful that any of China’s leaders have really given up on their plan to become, if not the world’s, then at least the region’s, most powerful player.
Even China’s more pragmatic leaders seem bent on the idea of taking back what they see as China’s rightful place atop the global power hierarchy. Whatever diplomacy they use is just a backdrop for the ultimate goal of becoming the major power in the region that calls all the shots. It is just a matter of how they will go about doing that and how long it will take.
Bo’s way was not working. China’s bellicosity came too early, and would have caused too many of its neighbors to band together to fight if it continued. The new path of cooperation is much more likely to work for Beijing, just like it did in the past, ever since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) formulated the stance: “Struggle with rivals, but make sure not to break the relationships.”
China will again attempt to lull its neighbors into complacency through cooperation, and many will fall into that trap because they will be happy to make money off the stable relationships between countries in the region.
However, China has already shown its cards over the past few years, demonstrating that it could easily turn into a regional bully. If anything, that has tipped everybody off to Beijing’s real plan — cooperate just long enough until it has the means to take over the entire region.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is