In a perfect world, China’s rise to power would be conducted peacefully and benefit not only itself, but its neighbors and the world at large. Pragmatic thinkers in China would prevail over their hawkish rivals and steer a course of cooperation — not confrontation — with the rest of the world, creating a win-win situation for everyone.
This is what many academics are again hoping for now that former Chinese Communist Party secretary of Chongqing and Cultural Revolution throwback Bo Xilai (薄熙來) has been toppled. They want a return to the good old days when everybody could make money in China and feel safe from Beijing making ridiculous demands on the rest of the world or military threats against its neighbors.
However, even without Bo around to sharpen the rhetoric, it seems unlikely that Beijing will return to an era of cooperation with the rest of the world, as Tamkang University professor Lin Chong-pin (林中斌) predicted in a recent analysis of Chinese diplomacy.
Lin is right that things have not gone so well for China diplomatically since it gave up on its good neighbor policy in 2009 to pursue its nationalist agenda in the region. The Philippines, Vietnam, Australia, the US, India and Japan all seem ready to gang up on China if it continues to throw its weight around in such a bellicose way.
It seems likely that leaders such as Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) and Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) know that, and are ready to put on a good face for a while to push forward China’s agenda without alarming the region.
The military hawks behind the new generation of smiling Chinese leaders will likely go along with this as long as they think it is necessary, or else they would not have allowed Bo to be pulled from his perch.
However, it is doubtful that any of China’s leaders have really given up on their plan to become, if not the world’s, then at least the region’s, most powerful player.
Even China’s more pragmatic leaders seem bent on the idea of taking back what they see as China’s rightful place atop the global power hierarchy. Whatever diplomacy they use is just a backdrop for the ultimate goal of becoming the major power in the region that calls all the shots. It is just a matter of how they will go about doing that and how long it will take.
Bo’s way was not working. China’s bellicosity came too early, and would have caused too many of its neighbors to band together to fight if it continued. The new path of cooperation is much more likely to work for Beijing, just like it did in the past, ever since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) formulated the stance: “Struggle with rivals, but make sure not to break the relationships.”
China will again attempt to lull its neighbors into complacency through cooperation, and many will fall into that trap because they will be happy to make money off the stable relationships between countries in the region.
However, China has already shown its cards over the past few years, demonstrating that it could easily turn into a regional bully. If anything, that has tipped everybody off to Beijing’s real plan — cooperate just long enough until it has the means to take over the entire region.
As Taiwan strives to attract more international students, yet another embarrassing incident of mistreatment came to light this week. The incident, involving students from Uganda, is yet another blemish on the nation’s human rights record, which is otherwise progressive. Online media firm The Reporter wrote in an investigative report that Ugandan students at Chung Chou University of Science and Technology in Changhua County’s Yuanlin City (員林) were denied promised scholarships and forced to work overnight factory shifts after they had been promised “paid internship opportunities.” There were also few classes in English compared with what was advertised, students said. Like many migrant workers
US-China relations are built on a series of fabrications about Taiwan. In fact, one of the major reasons the US-China relationship is so contentious right now is that Chinese belligerence is exposing these carefully constructed fictions to common sense. Readers know the story. In the 1970s and 1980s, American officials said what they needed to make common cause with Beijing vis-a-vis the Soviet Union. Diplomats couldn’t talk about Taiwan as a “country” — let alone an independent one — which it so clearly is. They enshrined in US policy that “all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there
Once a month, a government vehicle pulls up outside Government House, the official residence of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥), and an official from the Treasury Bureau alights to deliver a case laden with wads of Hong Kong dollar bank notes. Like the godfather of a mafia organization, Lam stockpiles her monthly salary in cash at her home. This is because Lam, who earns an annual salary of HK$5.2 million (US$667,517) and is one of the world’s highest-paid leaders, has no bank account. After Lam colluded with Beijing to impose a new National Security Law on the territory in
As we embark upon a new year, tensions across the Taiwan Strait continue to heighten by the day. While countries around the world are preoccupied with combating a fresh wave of COVID-19, China is using the opportunity to employ increasingly repressive measures in Hong Kong, Xinjiang — particularly to Turkic Uighurs — and Inner Mongolia. Meanwhile, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army is using every method at its disposal to continue to harass Taiwan, elevating the Taiwan Strait on a par with Ukraine as an issue of primary concern for the international community. Paradoxically, Taiwan’s economic and trade dependence on China has not declined,