Taiwan faces a rising national deficit and increasing government debt, so it is reasonable that the government proposes new taxes. However, the government has reiterated that it has no plan to re-impose a capital gains tax on investment income, be it from stock or property sales. This shows it is still not ready to create a fair taxation environment.
On Thursday, the Chinese-language United Evening News reported that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had allegedly discussed with Minister of Finance-designate Christina Liu (劉憶如) potential adjustments to the nation’s tax system, including the introduction of a capital gains tax on investment profits.
Although it was just media speculation about the “possibility” of such tariffs, both Liu and Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Chen Yuh-chang (陳裕璋), as well as Presidential Office officials, immediately said the report was inaccurate. They said the matter was still under consideration and there was no rush by the government to implement a capital gains tax without consulting the public.
The question is whether the immediate denials reflected the market’s anxiety over the government’s plan to address the tax exemption on capital gains — one of the most contested issues in the nation’s tax system — or if the reaction showed officials’ fear of repeating the experience of Shirley Kuo (郭婉容), whose announcement of a capital gains tax on securities transactions in 1988, when she was minister of finance, caused the stock market to plummet for 19 consecutive days, or that of Wang Chien-shien (王建煊), who quit as minister of finance in 1992 because he wanted to levy the land value increment tax based on the actual transaction price rather than the officially assessed land value.
Of course, reform is painful and tax reform especially hard. That is why tax experts, academics and the media have been discussing the idea of capital gains tax on and off since the government shelved the capital gains tax on securities in 1990. The good news is that through the years, an increasing number of people have been willing to consider the idea that investors could pay tax on capital gains, but deduct investment losses from taxable income.
The occasion of the appointment of a new finance minister is a good time for a serious discussion of how to promote a more equitable society through fairer taxation, including the capital gains tax.
On Friday, Liu said that once she assumes her new post, she plans to convene a national tax reform committee to draft new tax policies. Liu also said she welcomed suggestions to improve the nation’s financial health, but she made clear that she would not impose a capital gains tax on securities transactions during her term. If Liu meant it and if the government were to deliver on its promise of narrowing the gap between rich and poor, then a capital gains tax deserves public discussion, like a windfall tax or other measures that can enlarge the nation’s tax base and promote fairer taxation rates.
Even so, the idea of convening another national tax reform committee could terrify many people, as not long ago a similar tax reform committee publicly criticized itself as being nothing but a rubber-stamp body for the government’s tax-cut policy, and for helping to widen the nation’s wealth gap and increase government debt.
Whatever options are discussed by the committee and regardless of what conclusions are drawn, the key issue is the government’s determination to implement tax reform. What people need are officials who are professional enough to stand up to political pressure, rather than a government that simply talks but does nothing.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS