As next Saturday’s elections draw nearer, candidates from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are busy trying to secure additional support. They are either going around electioneering or attacking their opponents to get more media exposure. At times like these, politicians — be they pan-blue or pan-green — suddenly start paying a lot of attention to new immigrants who are voting for the first time.
Now, all three presidential candidates are saying they are “Hakka” and visiting Aboriginal villages, donning traditional Aboriginal clothing and pretending they are Aborigines — all in an attempt to gain votes. It would probably be safe to predict that when the next presidential election comes around, the candidates will all be referring to themselves as “new immigrants.” That is actually right, because the only distinction that can be made between people living in Taiwan is who got here a bit earlier and who got here a bit later. We are all immigrants in a sense. The problem is politicians do not realize this most of the time, but come election time, every presidential candidate suddenly develops an interest in “genealogy.” This is nothing but a trick to get people to vote for them.
The 450,000 spouses from China and Southeast Asia in Taiwan are in a minority, accounting for 2 percent of the population. Of these, 190,000 have already obtained citizenship and the right to vote. If they all voted for the same person, they could easily elect a legislator of their own choice. Unfortunately, there are no quotas for new immigrants and the election system distributes them across different areas, eroding their potential voting power. Like many other disadvantaged groups, they only get any attention at election time.
Tsai’s election slogan reads: “Thank you, Taiwan,” while Ma keeps talking about respecting cultural diversity. However, neither Tsai nor Ma has come up with a concrete response to the discrimination experienced by Chinese spouses and Southeast Asian women in their daily lives.
The legislative caucuses of both parties have also ignored calls to amend the fourth clause of the Nationality Act (國籍法), which makes it very hard for new immigrants who lose their spouse or foreign women who get divorced to gain citizenship, telling immigrant organizations that this is not a priority amendment and that it cannot be initiated. By letting immigrants wait in vain for such a simple amendment, how can they claim that they are concerned about their plight?
Furthermore, neither the KMT nor the DPP has responded to any of the many calls from immigrant groups that regulations requiring that interviews be held outside Taiwan for prospective immigrants from 20 different countries be abolished, that the time span for allowing Chinese spouses to obtain citizenship be the same as for other foreign spouses, that amnesty be granted to Chinese spouses who are in Taiwan illegally, and that regulations demanding that new immigrants renounce their original citizenship before they can become naturalized Taiwanese be removed.
Ma and Tsai have both made comments about implementing mother-tongue education for children, but neither has shown a willingness to include Southeast Asian languages as “local languages” alongside Hakka and Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese). All they have given is a bunch of empty promises.
In a survey conducted on Workers’ Day in 2009 into the troubles faced by foreign spouses, the Taiwan International Family Association found new immigrant spouses had become the new bottom rung of the labor ladder — with no labor or medical insurance and working long hours for low pay. Although Tsai has talked about technical training and employment incentives, this is just another slogan so far, and it is obvious she has no grasp of the problems that many new immigrant workers face on a daily basis.
We are sick and tired of seeing politicians only show an interest in disadvantaged groups at election time and we are even sicker of the means these political hacks use to gain votes. We urge new immigrants voting for the first time to see things clearly and be careful to elect politicians who are concerned with the issues that they face.
Lorna Kung is an adviser to the Taiwan International Family Association.
Translated by Drew Cameron
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The Executive Yuan and the Presidential Office on Monday announced that they would not countersign or promulgate the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) passed by the Legislative Yuan — a first in the nation’s history and the ultimate measure the central government could take to counter what it called an unconstitutional legislation. Since taking office last year, the legislature — dominated by the opposition alliance of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party — has passed or proposed a slew of legislation that has stirred controversy and debate, such as extending
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators have twice blocked President William Lai’s (賴清德) special defense budget bill in the Procedure Committee, preventing it from entering discussion or review. Meanwhile, KMT Legislator Chen Yu-jen (陳玉珍) proposed amendments that would enable lawmakers to use budgets for their assistants at their own discretion — with no requirement for receipts, staff registers, upper or lower headcount limits, or usage restrictions — prompting protest from legislative assistants. After the new legislature convened in February, the KMT joined forces with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and, leveraging their slim majority, introduced bills that undermine the Constitution, disrupt constitutional
RSS