The Past few weeks have been like a Neocon’s comeback convention in Taipei with visits from celebrated warmongers, including former US secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld and former World Bank president Paul Wolfowitz. It’s very easy to talk trash about these guys, but when you’re as isolated as Taiwan is, you need all the friends you can get — even if they are evil.
A few friends of mine mix in higher circles and one of them had the displeasure of dining with the Wolf while he was visiting — he even survived to tell the tale. Wolfowitz apparently told my buddy over burgers that Washington policy wonks couldn’t understand why President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is so unpopular, what with increased cross-strait stability and stable economic growth during his four years in office.
This got me thinking.
One reason that immediately sprang to mind is that many of us who are proud Taiwanese are fed up of hearing Ma drone on about his beloved China, China, China.
Another factor is that not many of us have actually prospered from the benefits that Ma’s headlong tilt strait-side have supposedly brought us. Unless you are a hotelier, tour operator, tour bus company or seller of certain types of local produce, the influx of Chicom tourists has had absolutely zero effect on our lives — while Ma’s flagship Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement has only benefited big business.
These factors have surely contributed to Ma’s lack of popularity, but by far and away the biggest factor in Ma’s dismal opinion poll ratings is Ma himself.
While the economy may be strong, Ma the man is most definitely weak. He may have the housewife vote sewn up, but only because they feel he is one of them. Sometimes I get the feeling that if Ma were suddenly taken ill one day and first lady Chow Mei-ching (周美青) had to step in for him on official duties, no one would even notice the difference.
How are people expected to take him seriously when on practically every public appearance he continues to spout complete and utter nonsense? Only last week Ma said that one of the biggest achievements of his presidency has been to reduce the price of rice wine. He even went as far to say that he would be proud to be known as the “Rice Wine President.” Actually, it could be an appropriate name for him, as it often seems like one would need to down half a bottle of the stuff to understand what the hell he is talking about.
Most of what Ma says is such claptrap I’m beginning to think his strategists and speechwriters are a bunch of gossiping housewives gathered round a table thinking up policy ideas as they wrap dumplings.
A perfect example of this came up last week when Ma presented his latest — yes, you guessed it — China-related policy: the peace accord.
What started off as a peace treaty quickly became an agreement. Then it accumulated a referendum before quickly changing into an accord as Ma and his camp furiously backpedaled.
He has now tacked on so many preconditions and prerequisites, including the 10 guarantees — one framework, two prerequisites, three principles and four assurances — that it sounds more like a recipe than a policy.
We Taiwanese may be an easygoing bunch, but we like a strong leader. Whatever your opinion of the two Chiangs (兩蔣), Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), they were strong men. Once they made up their minds, they didn’t change it and didn’t take shit from anyone. In this respect Ma is not fit to shine their boots.
Maybe if Mr Wolfowitz and his cohorts kept a closer eye on Taiwan matters this simple fact would be apparent. But I guess listening to the opinions of ordinary people is not one of Mr Wolfowitz’s strong points.
Joe Doufu is a Taipei-based satirist.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then