Yani Tseng (曾雅妮) won Taiwan’s first LPGA tournament, sharing some of the glory of her position as the queen of golf with fellow Taiwanese. The tournament was hosted by Hsu Tien-ya (許典雅) of the Sunrise Golf and Country Club, who invited the world’s top 10 female golfers to participate. Reporters from more than 20 countries covered the event, which was broadcast in dozens of countries.
Her outstanding performance has created a “Yani Tseng effect.” The story of her success, superior skills, high resistance to stress and concentration, of her self-confidence, love for Taiwan and donations to charity, makes her a worthy role model for young people — and no doubt, many will be tempted to try and emulate her. However, Tseng deserves credit not just for winning the tournament, but for bringing it here in the first place and helping widen the appeal of her sport.
Golf used to be a sport of the upper class. This view has now changed, and it has even entered elementary-school sports curriculums in many countries. However, in Taiwan, the sport incurs an entertainment tax and a luxury tax as if it needed to be as strictly supervised as the entertainment industry. The sight of 67,000 golf fans over four days following Tseng around the course will hopefully be enough to make the government relax golf-related regulations so that the sport can spread and become a pastime available to anyone.
A majority of the well-known international competitions organized by Taiwan recently have been hosted by the central or local governments, but the Sunrise LPGA was hosted by the Sunrise Group. Everything from signing a three-year contract and paying royalties of NT$700 million (US$23.25 million) to raising the finances, inviting the world’s top players, upgrading the course’s facilities and maintaining security was undertaken by the private sector. The success of the Sunrise LPGA tournament will hopefully inspire private businesses or organizations to take a more prominent role in international activities.
Although the government has basically been an outsider to the tournament, Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) has claimed it as part of the official celebrations for the Republic of China’s centenary.
A few years ago, Tseng suggested to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) that Taiwan arrange an LPGA tour event to help boost Taiwan’s visibility in the international arena. However, when Ma heard the cost would approach NT$200 million, he was taken aback and said the same amount of money would pay for dozens of running events. With that, any discussion of the government organizing an LPGA event came to an end. It was only due to the government’s lack of interest that the private sector took over, which is why Siew rather than Ma welcomed the participants at the opening banquet.
The Sports Affairs Council and Taiwan’s Olympic Committee wanted the hosts to adopt the “Chinese Taipei” model, using the flag and anthem used by the nation in the Olympics, but Hsu insisted that it was a Taiwanese competition organized by the private sector and that the national flag be used. So the national flag was displayed throughout the tournament, something else the government would not have done.
Taiwan’s first LPGA event brought joy and pride to millions. The one downside was that the event also highlighted government officials’ lack of international knowledge and experience as well as their lack of boldness and decisiveness. Taiwan has two more years of hosting an LPGA tournament ahead of it, giving the government two years to take notes and learn from the private sector how to become more flexible and responsive to change.
That would be a “win-win” situation, as the Ma administration and the business world like to say.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS