The disastrous effects of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) appear to be spreading. Taiwan’s overall economic indicator in August flashed a yellow-blue light, signifying a slowdown, for the first time in two years. Despite this, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government continue to tell us that the ECFA is beneficial to the economy and that the post-ECFA period will be a “golden decade” for Taiwan.
However, the figures suggest that, precisely because of the ECFA and the Ma administration’s policy of tying Taiwan’s economy to that of China, the nation is headed for a long period of stagnation. People are going to have a hard time and the misery is likely to be prolonged.
There are some aspects of this issue worthy of reflection.
The first point is that the rate of export growth has fallen for several years now. In order to get the ECFA signed as quickly as possible, Ma’s administration decided to act in concert with one of the key aspects of China’s 12th five-year plan, which is to seek a breakthrough in emerging strategic industries. To that end, it has permitted Taiwan’s cutting-edge technology companies to invest in China, along with entrepreneurs who have access to advanced farming know-how. As a result, Taiwan’s exports to China are slowing as products made in China gradually take their place.
Exports to China in August were only 7.9 percent up on the same month last year. This compares very poorly with South Korea, whose exports to China grew by 21.2 percent over the same period. If Ma’s China policy continues unchanged, Taiwan’s share of China’s import market will fall further and job opportunities in Taiwan are certain to diminish accordingly. With too many hands available to do too little work, real wages are bound to fall and the only thing to go up will be the misery index.
The second thing to worry about is the outflow of agricultural know-how, which is causing farmers’ incomes to fall. On the face of it, the ECFA “early harvest” list of goods and services eligible for immediate tariff concessions or exemptions appeared to involve China conceding benefits to Taiwan, but actually the benefits nowhere near make up for the massive losses arising from the outflow of farming know-how. Competition from the “Taiwanese farmers’ enterprise parks” that have been set up in various parts of China has already led to a big fall in Taiwan’s agricultural and fisheries exports to Japan, and to a growing cross-strait trade deficit in farm produce.
The average income for farmers last year was NT$884,000 (US$29,100), which is NT$70,000 less than three years ago. If that trend continues, the agricultural sector could go bust, at great cost to society as a whole.
The third point is that financial resources keep flowing out of Taiwan and into China. The post-ECFA financial sector rush continues apace. One result is that financial institutions have recently been vying to raise capital, but their fund-raising projects keep running aground. This is a sign that Taiwan’s financial resources are ebbing away.
Although NT$93.8 billion has already been raised through Taiwan depository receipts to fund Ma’s dream project of an Asia-Pacific capital-raising center, only 15 percent of that has remained in Taiwan.
This trend is becoming so serious that before long the westward march of Taiwanese banks is going to make it harder for small and medium-size enterprises in Taiwan to get the loans they need, and those who suffer the most will be blue-collar workers, as usual.
Given the Ma administration’s habit of blaming other people for anything that goes wrong, you can be sure that officials will attribute the economic slowdown to global factors. Don’t be fooled. None of the trends described above have anything to do with debt troubles in the eurozone.
Export growth is falling faster than that of our peers. Farmers are suffering more and our jobless rate is higher. These facts are undisputable. Are we going to just accept this downturn? Are we just going to kneel down and wait for the axe to fall?
The only way out for Taiwan is to dump Ma’s policy of locking our economy on to that of China.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Julian Clegg
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS