Nothing causes greater discord in Sino-US relations than the status of Taiwan, officially known as the Republic of China. However, the best way to maintain peace between Washington and Beijing may be for the US to continue selling weapons to Taiwan. Once ruled by Imperial China — but never Communist China — the Taiwanese have created a vibrant democracy. Yet their small nation risks being crushed by Bejing’s embrace.
During the Cold War, the two Chinas were bitterly at odds. As the People’s Republic of China (PRC) grew economically and moderated politically, it surged past Taipei on the international stage. Today the PRC is determined to reassert control over what it views as a renegade province.
Washington has promised to sell Taiwan weapons for its defense. Last year, the US announced a US$6.4 billion arms package. The Sino-US relationship will likely be the world’s most important bilateral connection this century. The two nations are tightly linked economically and they share many other interests — stability in East Asia, freedom of the seas, an open global economy and cooperative international institutions. Perhaps the most important objective for the existing superpower and the potential superpower is to avoid conflict. The PRC has demonstrated little interest in overseas military expansion or attacking the US. Economic competition between the two is growing in Asia, Africa and even South America, but Washington’s best response would be to liberalize the US economy, not deploy the US navy.
However, a clash is possible in East Asia. Today, the US dominates the region, even along China’s border, but the PRC is building deterrent forces, particularly missiles and submarines capable of sinking US aircraft carriers. The PRC poses no threat to the US homeland. However, Beijing doesn’t want the US to be able to threaten its homeland. Imagine if the Chinese navy were patrolling coasts right off the US, prepared to intervene in, say, Washington’s struggle with Hawaiian secessionists.
Since it is far cheaper to build defensive than offensive weapons, the US could bankrupt itself buying additional platforms to maintain its ability to attack China. Nevertheless, Washington should not abandon Taiwan. The nation is entitled to decide its own destiny. Certainly Beijing is not justified in attempting to coerce the Taiwanese people.
The best solution would be a negotiated settlement. The two states and peoples have drawn steadily closer. However, the PRC will make itself politically attractive only when it accepts a free society and a liberalized economy.
In the meantime, the US should authorize arms sales that enable Taiwan to maintain a military deterrent just as China is building a deterrent to the US. Taipei should not “try to match the PRC ship for ship, plane for plane, or missile for missile,” the Washington-based Taiwan Policy Working Group has said. Rather, Taipei should build a small, but deadly force capable of exacting a high price from any attackers.
Last year’s weapons package included Harpoon and Patriot missiles, mine-detection ships, Blackhawk helicopters and communications equipment. Washington put off any decision on advanced F-16s and diesel-electric submarines, but Taiwan is now pressing for the fighters.
The administration of US President Barack Obama has reportedly decided to refuse to supply the most advanced aircraft because China might retaliate diplomatically. However, empowering Taiwan is worth risking tense relations with the PRC. After all, arms sales do not put the US and China closer to a path to war. Rather, they create a disincentive for Beijing to consider war as an option.
That’s why a reasonable accommodation between China and Taiwan is more likely if Taipei possesses the ability to defend itself. Taiwanese officials repeatedly made this point on my recent visit to the nation.
Vice Minister of National Defense Andrew Yang (楊念祖) said the objective was to create a force that tells China: “Don’t mess with us, for you will pay a big price if you do.”
Ambassador Stephen Chen (陳錫蕃), now at the National Policy Foundation, said that better aircraft would increase Taiwan’s bargaining power: “When we enter into political negotiations with the mainland, we need to go into negotiations from a position of strength.”
Of course, Taipei should not be purely reliant on the US. Taiwan recently deployed its third generation of Brave Wind anti-ship missiles. Taipei is also considering production of the Hsiung Feng-2E ballistic missile. Even a small strategic deterrent would force the PRC to hesitate before threatening Taiwan.
Washington should help Taipei defend itself. Peace is in the interest of Taiwan, China and the US. Washington should maintain a good relationship with the PRC, but continue arms sales to Taipei to preserve stability and peace across the Taiwan Strait.
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and a former special assistant to former US president Ronald Reagan.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized
RSS