Diplomacy is an important realization of a nation’s sovereignty. The main goal of diplomats is to uphold the independence, integrity and security of their country. If the steadiness of a nation’s diplomacy is judged by whether another country rejects a request to establish relations, then that country has lost autonomy over its diplomatic affairs. Could it then still be called a country?
This logic is common sense in today’s world, yet President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), vying for re-election, does not have even the most basic understanding of this.
A proud Ma recently said in a public announcement that his “flexible diplomacy” has allowed Taiwan and China to escape vicious competition for diplomatic allies.
He said the government had learned that at least three diplomatic allies considered switching diplomatic recognition to China, but were rejected by Beijing. The logic of this statement is that we should all kneel down and thank China for its kindness and be grateful it allowed Taiwan to keep its diplomatic allies.
Ma clearly believes that Beijing accepts the “diplomatic truce” he has been advocating and Taiwan therefore no longer needs to put up with “blackmail” and “threats” from diplomatic allies. Indeed, he said that Taiwan can now confidently say no to its allies when it has to, which would earn it respect among other countries. He also said diplomatic expenditures have been cut over the past three years and these funds can be diverted to other areas.
The Ma administration, then, is not maintaining its diplomatic relations by strengthening ties with Taiwan’s allies. Instead, it seems to despise and loathe them. Is this really what Ma thinks diplomacy is about? What does he take our diplomatic allies for? Is Ma not worried about what would happen if they heard these remarks? If the Ma administration really thought this attitude would earn respect among other countries, then diplomatic relations should in fact have been further consolidated. Why, then, did three diplomatic allies want to establish ties with China?
Judging from Ma’s comments, the cuts to diplomatic expenditures during the past three years were done on purpose. Looking at the cuts to the national defense budget over the same period — not forgetting Taiwan’s problems in obtaining arms from the US — it is as plain as day that Ma’s “flexible diplomacy” and decision not to use force to resolve cross-strait disputes amount to laying down arms and accepting Taiwan’s sovereignty and security are dependent on China’s whim.
The legally assigned duties of the president of Taiwan include diplomacy, national defense and cross-strait relations. Now diplomacy and national defense have weakened and all Ma pays attention to is cross-strait relations, which he touts as being the warmest ever. What is Ma doing? The president of the Control Yuan recently lashed out at civil servants by saying people who receive monthly salaries of NT$90,000, but perform the job of someone who makes NT$20,000, were guilty of fraud. This was indeed a very fitting description.
Why doesn’t China need to establish diplomatic relations with Taiwan’s allies at the moment? It is because Ma promotes a “one China” policy — his economic and political policies are gradually undermining Taiwanese independence and promoting unification. The fact that Beijing’s dream of setting up a puppet regime in Taiwan can get a foothold in the government is a huge gift to China. China has searched for 60 years without finding someone, so this truly is an “historic moment.” All the Chinese Communist Party has to do now is to lend its support and it will get what it wants without even having to go to any great lengths. How can Ma believe that Taiwan can win respect from other countries and Taiwanese can live with dignity?
Recently, the US had its credit rating downgraded and global panic ensued. When the Ma administration’s reaction was slow, the Chinese government started giving Ma “directions” via its Web sites, telling him he must take action and those actions must be effective in the same tone one might adopt when speaking to a subordinate. How many Taiwanese are comfortable with this tone of voice?
There is huge conflict between Taiwan and China when it comes to their core interests. In fact, the two have hardly anything in common at all. China has shown itself very capable of treating the political parties in Taiwan differently, simply because China wants Taiwanese political parties that are beneficial to China, but those parties will never be good for Taiwan. The question is: What are such parties doing in Taiwan?
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS