What good is a foreign ministry if it cannot defend a nation’s name and dignity when the need arises? Sadly, this appears to be a recurring situation in Taiwan. Despite a protest lodged by the Government Information Office about two weeks ago, the Taiwanese public was yesterday treated to the news that the Taiwan-produced epic Seediq Bale (賽德克巴萊) is still labeled as a film made in “China, Taiwan” on the Venice Film Festival’s Web site.
The film’s director, Wei Te-sheng (魏德聖), was quoted by local media as saying that he was at one point asked by foreign ministry officials what he felt the bottom line on the matter was.
“I am just a movie maker,” Wei said dejectedly. “Why are we the ones who need to define a stance on the matter?”
One can’t blame Wei for feeling demoralized. After all, just as it is natural to expect athletes to perform at their best and represent their country with honor at an international sports competition, it is natural to expect film directors to do their utmost to deliver to the world high-quality movies that would do their nation proud.
Isn’t it also natural to expect a nation’s foreign affairs officials to do their job, namely defend and safeguard their country’s name and dignity?
As Wei successfully lives up to all that is expected of him as a movie maker and more, delivering quality films and having been nominated for the Golden Lion award, why can’t the nation’s foreign affairs officials do their job, namely fight for the country’s name, not quiz Wei on what he feels the “bottom line” should be? To say that Taiwanese are shocked by the seeming incompetence of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is an understatement.
The lassitude of the ministry, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government as a whole, is truly disheartening.
The ministry’s ineptitude brings to mind an incident in March 2009 in which Yushan was labeled as being “Chinese Taipei” in an online competition to find the “seven natural wonders” of the world.
More than two years have passed and today Yushan remains a wonder of “Chinese Taipei,” according to the New7Wonders Foundation’s Web site. So much for Taiwan’s stunning natural beauty and so much for the hard work of the nation’s people when as a result of the government’s incompetence and stupor, Taiwan is so easily dismissed from the world map so that China can step in and take the credit.
The ministry on Tuesday gathered in Taipei the 81 heads of Taiwan’s overseas diplomatic missions and representative offices and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) trumpeted how his “flexible diplomacy” has borne fruit these past three years.
However, judging Ma’s words in the context of the Seediq Bale and Yushan incidents, Ma cannot possibly be suggesting that the ministry’s officials have done a good enough job in their service of the nation.
The point of having a foreign ministry and training foreign affairs officials is enabling them to defend and promote the nation’s existence and dignity.
We all know it is tough for the nation’s foreign affairs officials to fight the reality in which more often than not international organizations must yield to China’s bullying, but it is even more disheartening to see Taiwan’s own top decisionmakers seemingly not bothered by incidents that so deeply affect Taiwanese.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS