What good is a foreign ministry if it cannot defend a nation’s name and dignity when the need arises? Sadly, this appears to be a recurring situation in Taiwan. Despite a protest lodged by the Government Information Office about two weeks ago, the Taiwanese public was yesterday treated to the news that the Taiwan-produced epic Seediq Bale (賽德克巴萊) is still labeled as a film made in “China, Taiwan” on the Venice Film Festival’s Web site.
The film’s director, Wei Te-sheng (魏德聖), was quoted by local media as saying that he was at one point asked by foreign ministry officials what he felt the bottom line on the matter was.
“I am just a movie maker,” Wei said dejectedly. “Why are we the ones who need to define a stance on the matter?”
One can’t blame Wei for feeling demoralized. After all, just as it is natural to expect athletes to perform at their best and represent their country with honor at an international sports competition, it is natural to expect film directors to do their utmost to deliver to the world high-quality movies that would do their nation proud.
Isn’t it also natural to expect a nation’s foreign affairs officials to do their job, namely defend and safeguard their country’s name and dignity?
As Wei successfully lives up to all that is expected of him as a movie maker and more, delivering quality films and having been nominated for the Golden Lion award, why can’t the nation’s foreign affairs officials do their job, namely fight for the country’s name, not quiz Wei on what he feels the “bottom line” should be? To say that Taiwanese are shocked by the seeming incompetence of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is an understatement.
The lassitude of the ministry, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government as a whole, is truly disheartening.
The ministry’s ineptitude brings to mind an incident in March 2009 in which Yushan was labeled as being “Chinese Taipei” in an online competition to find the “seven natural wonders” of the world.
More than two years have passed and today Yushan remains a wonder of “Chinese Taipei,” according to the New7Wonders Foundation’s Web site. So much for Taiwan’s stunning natural beauty and so much for the hard work of the nation’s people when as a result of the government’s incompetence and stupor, Taiwan is so easily dismissed from the world map so that China can step in and take the credit.
The ministry on Tuesday gathered in Taipei the 81 heads of Taiwan’s overseas diplomatic missions and representative offices and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) trumpeted how his “flexible diplomacy” has borne fruit these past three years.
However, judging Ma’s words in the context of the Seediq Bale and Yushan incidents, Ma cannot possibly be suggesting that the ministry’s officials have done a good enough job in their service of the nation.
The point of having a foreign ministry and training foreign affairs officials is enabling them to defend and promote the nation’s existence and dignity.
We all know it is tough for the nation’s foreign affairs officials to fight the reality in which more often than not international organizations must yield to China’s bullying, but it is even more disheartening to see Taiwan’s own top decisionmakers seemingly not bothered by incidents that so deeply affect Taiwanese.
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) earlier this month said it is necessary for her to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and it would be a “huge boost” to the party’s local election results in November, but many KMT members have expressed different opinions, indicating a struggle between different groups in the party. Since Cheng was elected as party chairwoman in October last year, she has repeatedly expressed support for increased exchanges with China, saying that it would bring peace and prosperity to Taiwan, and that a meeting with Xi in Beijing takes priority over meeting
Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman for maritime affairs Rogelio Villanueva on Monday said that Manila’s claims in the South China Sea are backed by international law. Villanueva was responding to a social media post by the Chinese embassy alleging that a former Philippine ambassador in 1990 had written a letter to a German radio operator stating that the Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island, 黃岩島) did not fall within Manila’s territory. “Sovereignty is not merely claimed, it is exercised,” Villanueva said. The Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in 2016 that found China’s sweeping claim of sovereignty in
RSS