Questions have been raised again about the safety of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, which is still under construction. The Atomic Energy Council asked Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) to provide a list by the end of the year of the structural changes it will make to ensure safe operations at the plant, following the release of a paper by a nuclear engineer and adviser to the council that highlights construction flaws.
However, of even greater concern than the proposed start-up of the fourth plant in 2014 is that Taiwan has almost run out of space to store the nuclear waste that has been produced since the nation’s first three plants became operational. And the government has almost no feasible options for new containment sites.
The two facilities that collect waste from the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in Shihmen District (石門), New Taipei City (新北市) — the first one built — are at 89.95 and 85.5 percent of capacity, the Ministry of Audit said on July 29. The storage unit for the Guosheng plant in Wanli (萬里), New Taipei City, is more than 70 percent full and the unit for the Ma-anshan plant in Ma-anshan (馬鞍山), Pingtung County, is almost half full.
Construction of spent fuel dry-storage facilities will not begin until April 2015 at the earliest — that’s if the Ministry of Economic Affairs can figure out where to build the facility in the first place. Not surprisingly, the counties that have been mentioned as possible sites are not keen on the idea. Why should they be when they can see the disastrous way Taipower has run its waste storage facility on Orchid Island, not to mention its lackadaisical approach to maintentance at the plants themselves?
The government selected Longmen (龍門) on Orchid Island’s southern tip for what was billed as a “temporary” nuclear waste disposal facility, even though it planned to store as many as 340,000 barrels there over a 50-year period. It lied to the people of the island for years, telling them it was building a fish cannery. Shipments of nuclear waste from Taiwan proper began in May 1982 and continued until 1996. However, a three-year-long inspection and rehousing project that began in 2008 found that 78,000 of the 98,112 barrels stored in more than a score of concrete trenches at the repository were rusted. It seems no one realized that Orchid Island’s high temperatures, high humidity and salty environment might make it a bad place to store iron containers in an open-air facility.
Then there are the complaints about accidents and poor maintenance at the three operating plants. Robert Greenspan, president of US-based Midco Diving and Marine Services, which had been hired to do underwater maintenance at the Guosheng plant’s suppression pools in late 2008 and early 2009, told the Taipei Times in April that Taipower’s nuclear power plants looked more “like the back room of a lousy auto parts store.”
While the Ministry of Audit might win some praise for raising the storage issue, it is worrisome that it said it noticed the problem while examining government spending last year. The question of storage is not a new issue. Taipower signed a deal with North Korea on Jan. 11, 1997, to ship 200,000 barrels of low-level waste there — an arrangement that was quickly scotched after protests from South Korea and others — and in 2002 there were reports a deal was being negotiated with the Solomon Islands to send nuclear waste there.
The government must give its full attention to handling the nuclear waste we already have before moving ahead with a problem-ridden plant that would only create more waste. If it is looking for some creative ideas, why not contact Richard Handl in Sweden. He’s an unemployed guy with an interest in nuclear physics who spent a couple of months trying to build a nuclear reactor in his kitchen, with materials sourced from eBay and Germany.
At least he’s proved he thinks outside the box.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS