The recent furor over an internal WHO memo downgrading Taiwan to a “province of China” and the government’s inept handling of this matter has set a dangerous precedent that could further erode Taiwan’s international standing.
When the WHO document was first disclosed by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) it triggered public outrage.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was slow to catch on to the implications. Instead, he touted it as one of his administration’s achievements that Taiwan had been able to attend the World Health Assembly (WHA) as an observer under the name “Chinese Taipei” since 2009. Ma further claimed that his cross-strait policy had secured this goodwill gesture from China.
Ma promptly changed his tune when he realized that this could become a liability in his upcoming presidential campaign and called a press conference in which he clenched his fist and gnashed teeth — but still barely managed to protest, calling the WHO memo unreasonable, unfair and “inconsistent” with past practices. He also promised to deliver a strong letter of protest to the WHO Secretariat.
When the letter was made public after Department of Health Minister Chiu Wen-ta (邱文達) delivered it to the WHO, it caused further public disappointment and anger.
The letter merely asked the Secretariat to be consistent in referring to Taiwan as “Chinese Taipei” and did not attempt to refute the WHO’s assertion that Taiwan is a “province of China.”
Kuan revealed further documents issued by the WHO Secretariat which refer to Taiwan as an “area” of China, relegating Taiwan’s status to that of Hong Kong and Macau.
“The expression ‘Chinese Taipei’ should only be used for the list of participants, summary records and similar documents of World Health Assemblies to which that entity is invited as an observer,” a new memo added.
In other words, Taiwan is referred to as “Chinese Taipei” for just the five days a year when the health minister attends the WHA. By failing to assert that Taiwan is a sovereign state, and not part of China, Ma has given the international community the misleading impression that Taiwan agrees that it is part of China.
It fell to US Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius to speak out for Taiwan. In response to questions from reporters, Sebelius said no UN agency had the right to unilaterally determine Taiwan’s status. Ma should have thanked Sebelius for her remarks and agreed with her position.
When then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) sent a letter to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in the summer of 2007, indicating Taiwan’s interest in joining the world body, Ban brazenly responded that the UN considered Taiwan to be part of China. Washington warned Ban that this was not the position of the US.
The WHO debacle shows that Ma’s policy of cozying up to China and distancing the nation from allies like the US and Japan can only further erode international support.
The episode also shows that Ma’s policies have reduced, rather than increased, Taiwan’s international space. Instead of bringing “substantive participation,” they have garnered only empty promises. Instead of enhancing the health and well-being of Taiwanese, they have brought Taiwan closer into the unwelcome embrace of an authoritarian China.
Let’s hope that Taiwanese see through the rosy misrepresentations of the Ma administration’s policies and cast their vote for a party that truly represents the interests of Taiwan and its freedom-loving people in next year’s elections.
Chen Mei-chin is a commentator based in Washington.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
RSS