Racism begone
The very good recent editorial on racism toward Aborigines was well-written and to the point (“Racist remarks cannot be tolerated,’’ May 18, page 8). Racist remarks by any public figure, be he or she a member of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) or the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), should never be tolerated in this multi-ethnic nation.
So shame on Liao Wan-lung (廖萬隆), a member of the KMT, for wondering out loud in public “whether it would be possible to discourage intermarriage between Aborigines and other ethnicities to ensure the preservation of Aborigines’ cultural heritage.’’
And shame on President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) for his “tepid response [to Liao that] simply did not go far enough.”
Although, to tell the truth, the KMT is not the only party to say racist things about Taiwan’s Aborigines. A few years ago, a DPP legislator in Taipei referred, in public, to Aborigines with the racist word Huan-ah — a slur in Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) that literally means “wild savages.” I read about this incident in the Taipei Times, by the way.
One more note, speaking of racism: I have also noticed that sometimes — not always, but sometimes — when a front page or inside photograph depicting Taiwanese Aborigines appears in your newspaper, it is often given a witty yet mocking title and caption, insulting the spiritual beliefs of Aborigines in some instances or gently mocking their clothes, their facial tattoos or their customs.
You would never permit photo headlines or photo captions that mock African Americans or Christians or Muslims, yet for some reason your copy editors (and their supervising editors) sometimes allow photo headlines and photo captions that treat Aborigines in a jocular, mocking and yes, racist way.
If it’s wrong for KMT and DPP legislators to make racist comments about Aborigines, and it is, then it is also wrong for the progressive and liberal Taipei Times to treat Aboriginal customs and beliefs in racist, Han-supremacist ways.
I hope future photo captions and titles will reflect my concerns.
ARRON BECK
Kenting, Taiwan
Raising standards
John Fleckenstein’s letter did not come too late — it just should have popped up as banner headline (Letter, May 17, page 8).
Taiwan’s seemingly helpless Ministry of Transportation and Communications has never tackled the issue of “idling engines,” despite sufficient information and literature about the waste of energy and money, insanity and health damage caused by idling engines.
Taipei’s scooters are only one example. Another is the dozens of tourist buses whose engines are left running with the air conditioning on and the door open (frequently with a sleeping driver inside). One can see this every day at all the tourist spots.
A further example: Families with babies and young children sleeping in their vans and cars as they enjoy a fine Sunday afternoon, with their air conditioning and engine running.
Never heard of carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide? Don’t these people care about their fellow citizens or the environment?
Taiwan has enough schools and education institutes, unfortunately populated by many students who are also idling, since learning is intended primarily for exams. How much do Taiwan’s students learn about life or a “life with higher qualities?” What about a life that respects humans and nature or a life with morals, caring for others and responsibility?
Idling scooters are a prominent problem, although just a part of the country’s notorious sub-standards. It’s the duty of everybody to raise these standards.
ENGELBERT ALTENBURGER
Kaohsiung
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
RSS