On May 4, Council of Indigenous Peoples Minister Sun Ta-chuan (孫大川) presented a report to the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Standing Committee on ethnic development and autonomy for Aborigines. Saying that Aborigines had interbred with other ethnic groups, Liao Wan-lung (廖萬隆), a member of the committee, wondered whether it would be possible to discourage intermarriage between Aborigines and other ethnicities to ensure the preservation of Aborigines’ cultural heritage.
When Liao finished, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who is also the KMT chairman, replied that individuals were free to make their own decisions about whom they fell in love with and married, adding: “I am sorry, but I cannot comply.”
It goes without saying that Liao’s proposal incensed Aborigines, but so did Ma’s reply. Anyone hearing such blatant racial prejudice would be angry, and would have reprimanded Liao for his bigoted comments right on the spot. Even though Ma did not support Liao’s suggestion, such a tepid response simply did not go far enough.
Liao isn’t qualified to sit on the KMT Central Standing Committee. Ma should have slapped him down there and then or immediately referred him to the disciplinary committee. How could Ma justify dismissing the notion simply with some vague platitude about individual freedoms?
While people are allowed to express themselves freely within the committee, Liao’s words not only run counter to common sense, the Constitutional right of racial equality and the laws protecting the rights of Aborigines, they also managed, in one fell swoop, to bring the KMT’s policy on Aborigines crashing down at their feet.
The failure to adequately deal with Liao shows a lack of will within the KMT to shun overt racism. Perhaps this is because Liao’s comments represent what many within the KMT really think. Perhaps, deep down, the KMT regards blood and DNA as central to its legitimacy and governance over the hoi polloi.
Taiwan is a nation of migrants. The majority of Taiwanese are from families that moved to Taiwan, at some point or other, from various places. Taiwanese have also moved in the opposite direction, emigrating to various countries. Interracial propagation is a long-term process that happens in migratory societies.
The first waves of immigrants to Taiwan from China vied for space with the Aborigines living in the lowland areas and mountainous regions when they arrived, followed by farmers from Fujian Province and Hakka groups mixing with the Aborigines. Later, Taiwanese would struggle with their Japanese colonial masters and then, after the end of World War II, the KMT forces arrived from China. Each wave of immigration involved the spilling of blood, before the struggle between clashing ethnic groups calmed down and Taiwan slowly moved toward a state of racial harmony. Liao’s words, and his presumption of racial superiority, have reopened many of these old wounds. It was an unforgivable error.
Liao was forced to make a public apology after his comments were reported by the media and were met with strong protests by Aboriginal groups. Nevertheless, judging by the way both Liao and the KMT reacted, it’s clear that they remain unaware of what they did wrong and have merely relented in the face of external pressure to contain the fallout. They will be keeping their heads low until everything has blown over, but they will be back to their old ways.
This was a good opportunity for Ma and the KMT to come clean and address the issue of racism within the party, and they failed to take it. Liao is not the only one with such views within the KMT. This kind of attitude is sure to rear its ugly head somewhere down the line, and the next time the political and social cost will be even greater.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS