President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has accused the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government of restricting cross-strait trade exchanges, saying that this resulted in a sharp increase in Taiwanese investment in China and cross-strait trade. However, since Taiwan and China signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), Taiwanese businesspeople have shown a renewed willingness to return to Taiwan, Ma said, adding that this has caused cross-strait trade as a proportion of overall trade to decrease.
The truth is that after three years under the Ma administration, Taiwanese investment in China has surged, the number of Taiwanese businesspeople returning home has been limited, foreign investment has dropped and Taiwanese capital has flooded out.
The signing of the ECFA was aimed at canceling the negative impact on Taiwanese exports to China after ASEAN Plus One came into effect on Jan. 1 last year. It was also intended to increase the competitiveness of Taiwanese exports to China, thanks partly to the much-touted early harvest list that was supposed to give Taiwan initial special tariff-free treatment on certain exports.
However, Ma has now turned around and said the slowing growth of cross-strait trade following the -implementation of the ECFA is a good thing. This contradicts his original statements.
Since the ECFA took effect, the growth of Taiwanese exports to China has dropped dramatically, while imports from China have continued to grow. Indeed, the growth in Taiwanese shipments to China, including Hong Kong, have fallen far more sharply compared with Taiwan’s other major trading partners. The proportion of Taiwanese exports going to China, including Hong Kong, accounted for 40.7 percent of overall trade in the first two months of this year compared with 42 percent in the same period last year. As for imports from China, including Hong Kong, they increased from 14.2 percent in the first two months of last year to 14.8 percent this year.
Government statistics showed that cumulative Taiwanese investment in China was US$64.9 billion as of late 2007. By the end of last year, that figure had reached US$97.3 billion. After Ma came into power, Taiwanese investment in China increased by 128 percent year-on-year to US$10.6 billion in 2008. In 2009, annual investment fell 33 percent from a year earlier because of the global financial crisis and cumulative Taiwanese investment totaled US$71.4 billion. Last year, annual investment surged 102 percent from 2009 to US$12.23 billion.
After just three years under the Ma administration, Taiwanese investment in China has reached 50 percent of the total invested there by Taiwanese businesspeople in the 23 years before Ma came into office.
It is hard to say how many Taiwanese businesspeople have returned because many of their investments are not registered as being made by returning businesspeople. The government also does not regularly release such investment figures. According to available statistics, returning businesspeople have invested about US$3.3 billion since Ma took office. However, if we look at foreign direct investment, Taiwan seems to be quickly losing its competitive advantage. In the 1990s, the average growth rate for foreign capital entering Taiwan was 11 percent. Under the DPP government, it was 34.8 percent, but during Ma’s three years in office, it has dropped to a shocking minus 36.2 percent.
A closer look at foreign capital movement — including direct investment and equity investments — shows that the net outflow of foreign capital in the 1990s was less than US$20 billion, with an annual average of less than US$2 billion. From 2000 to 2007 when the DPP was in office, the net outflow of foreign capital reached US$105.8 billion, or an average of US$13.2 billion per year. During Ma’s three years in power, the net outflow of foreign capital reached almost US$60 billion, or an annual average of almost US$20 billion.
Large outflows of capital have led to huge outflows of human capital and a massive decrease in domestic demand. These factors have seriously damaged the impetus for economic growth in the country.
To be precise, Taiwan’s ratio of idle capital is increasing and the impetus for domestic investment continues to fall. In the 1980s, savings on average exceeded loans by less than NT$800 billion annually. In the 1990s this increased to more than NT$2.5 trillion per year. During the eight years the DPP was in power, the annual average was NT$7 trillion, compared with an annual average of more than NT$10 trillion for the three years Ma has been in power.
In this age of globalization, a government cannot force skilled labor and capital to remain in the country. The government must instead attract resources and skilled workers by strengthening national competitiveness. It does not matter whether the DPP or KMT is in charge; what matters are appropriate responses to the challenges posed by globalization.
Tung Chen-yuan is a professor at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of Development Studies.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS