Apart from accumulating a bunch of foreign reserves and constructing a truckload of huge buildings that other countries cannot be bothered building anymore, China’s self-proclaimed “rise to power” does not include the cultivation of any soft power it can brag about. Therefore, China has had to resort to locating antiques and has even rolled out Confucius (孔子) in its quest to establish some form of soft power. In the process, Beijing has established Confucius Institutes around the world and even erected a huge statue of Confucius standing on equal ground with the statue of former Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) in Tiananmen Square.
As China was busy honoring Confucius, the Taiwanese Ministry of Education also just happened to announce that it will be listing the Four Books of Confucianism as “basic teaching materials for teaching Chinese culture” and that it will make the study of them compulsory in senior high school in the hope that the 2,000-year-old teachings can be a super-fix for complex problems, such as school bullying and drug use among students.
Unexpectedly, before it had been there for even 100 days, the Confucius statue was removed from Tiananmen Square, suddenly and mysteriously in the space of one night — spirited away just like many of China’s human rights activists have been “removed.” In China, where things are not transparent and where every last thing has a political connotation, the sudden appearance and disappearance of the statue is no trivial matter.
Since ancient times, the reverence, or lack thereof, that Confucius has received in China at any one time has been a good way of judging developments in Chinese politics. Confucius has also been the scapegoat for cultural and political struggle in China for a long time.
During the May Fourth Movement, the slogan “Down with the Confucian shop” became popular. In the 1970s, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) initiated a movement in which former CCP vice chairman Lin Biao (林彪) and Confucius were denounced together. These developments in China made dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) very happy. He in turn used the opportunity to start revering Confucian thought again as part of a “cultural renaissance.”
Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) sidekicks must know about how Mao admired China’s first emperor, Qin Shihuang (秦始皇) and his burning of books and burying of scholars. Mao referred to the first emperor as the pioneer of the anti-Confucian movement. Mao even laughed at Chinese author Guo Moruo (郭沫若) when he said the communist party of the future would worship Confucius.
The display of statues of Confucius and Mao together in Tiananmen Square represents a major battle for status between Confucianism and Maoism in China and this struggle clearly shows that China is not the “harmonious society” the Chinese government would like us to believe. There is obviously more than meets the eye behind Hu’s sudden backtracking.
China’s “rise” is all about money, corruption and an ever-increasing gap between the rich and poor. These have become the “Chinese characteristics” Beijing so often talks about and this has provided Maoist proponents, the leftists, with a chance to make a comeback. Those that are now in power do not dare reform the system and they are incapable of solving problems, so now they have brought out Mao’s foe, Confucius.
Anti-Confucians have long criticized Confucians as talking a lot about humanity, justice and morality with nothing but greed and lust in their hearts.
In the recent battle between Confucius and Mao, Confucius has lost and the people who decided to erect the statue in Tiananmen Square could be in serious trouble. Taipei has been emphasizing Confucius as a model for the times by reviving the old practices of revering Confucius and studying the Confucian canon. However, the recent “disappearance” of the statue in China and the fact that it is unlikely to ever see the light of day again, is very interesting.
If Confucius doesn’t re-appear, this would be a good thing, as it would save Taiwanese students from being forced to recite his scriptures.
James Wang is a commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Drew Cameron
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
RSS