It’s often hard to feel sorry for politicians because one day’s victim can turn around and be equally offensive to someone else the next. However, it has to be acknowledged that female politicians the world over have a tougher time than their male counterparts.
If they are not married, their sexual preferences are queried or they are ridiculed for not being able to find a partner. Married or not — and with or without children — their maternal instincts are mocked, as German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, among others, can attest. Either way, they are challenged as men rarely are for putting their career over or before a partner and family.
The recent smear campaign — that is the only way to describe it — launched by one-time democracy activist and darling of the international human rights world turned publicity hound Shih Ming-teh (施明德) against Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential hopeful Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) shows that even a man who spent more than 25 years in prison for his political beliefs can be just as misogynistic as the average male chauvinist.
On April 14, while making a plug for Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良), one of Tsai’s rivals for the DPP presidential nomination process, Shih said Tsai should “clarify” her sexual orientation because voters “deserved a clear answer” before deciding on a candidate.
Earlier in the day he had attacked the third DPP hopeful, Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), not by questioning his sexual preferences, but over his democratic credentials. Neither Su nor Tsai had played a key role in Taiwan’s democracy movement in the 1970s and 1980s, Shih said, adding that not a “single one” of the key democratic trailblazers like himself had gone on to high-level government roles.
If a trailblazer is defined, as Shih appeared to be doing, as someone who was imprisoned for his or her political activism, then once again his misogyny was shining through by ignoring former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) or Greater Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) — his co-defendants in the Kaohsiung Incident trial.
Lu and Chen have certainly blazed trails — and they have battled critics questioning their unmarried state along the way.
Lu was frequently mocked during her years as a legislator over her marital status, not to mention the nationwide snickering that ensued in December 2001 when another publicity hound, Tung Nien-tai (董念台), dressed in a flashy tuxedo and armed with a huge bouquet of roses, attempted to lead a 24-car motorcade to the Presidential Office to propose to then-vice president Lu. Stopped by police, Tung first accused Lu of not having the decency to refuse him to his face, then said she was “not good enough” to marry him. Two months later, another alleged suitor spent a fortune to erect a large billboard along a Changhua County highway declaring his love for Lu.
Far too many people thought it was okay for these two men to try and humiliate Lu because she was in her late 50s and not married. Was she supposed to be gratified that any man thought of marrying her?
Misogyny is no laughing matter, and neither is Shih’s attempt to smear Tsai. It seems unlikely Shih would really want to see his suggestion carried out equally — to say that any man running for office must “clarify” his sexuality or that married politicians must “clarify” if they have mistresses or lovers or if they beat their wives/husbands/partners or children.
However, this is not really a question of sexual identity or gay rights as much as it is yet another attempt to denigrate and sideline a female politician with a sexually based offensive. And it is disheartening to be reminded that someone who once fought so hard for democracy remains so anachronistic in his thinking.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS