Sometimes you really do have to ask yourself whether President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is actually living in cloud cuckoo land.
Fresh from the fiasco of nominating a controversial “dinosaur” judge to the Council of Grand Justices, Ma got it wrong again in a comment he made about the economy. On Saturday he said that last year’s economic growth rate was the best the Taiwanese economy has seen in 63 years. What on earth is he talking about? This goes against the facts of Taiwan’s economic development. Ma was here during Taiwan’s most prosperous era, so how can he not recall those heady days?
Let’s look at the figures. Last year the economy grew at a rate of 10.82 percent. That’s a pretty healthy rate, but nothing out of the ordinary compared with the kinds of rates we were seeing from the 1960s to the 1980s, when figures exceeding 10 percent were relatively common. Specifically, in 1964, 1965 and 1967 the economic growth rate in Taiwan was 11.57, 10.85 and 10.41 percent, respectively.
The 1970s saw even higher rates. In 1970 the rate was 10.60 percent. The following year it jumped to 12.45 percent, which, though impressive, was trumped by 13.15 percent in 1972. It was slightly lower in 1973, at 11.83 percent, but then was back up again in 1976, reaching 13.45 percent. The highest figure was that of 1978, when the rate climbed to 13.49 percent.
Not wanting to labor the point, the 1980s saw growth rates of 11.00, 10.68 and 10.38 percent in 1986, 1987 and 1989 respectively.
Looking at these figures, one notices that the rate exceeded 11 percent on seven occasions. How, then, can Ma claim that last year’s rate represented the highest economic growth rate in 63 years?
The reason why last year’s rate was so high was simply because the base rate to which it was compared was so low. In 2008 and 2009, at the very beginning of Ma’s presidency, the growth rate was 0.73 percent and minus-1.93 percent respectively. For two years running, then, Taiwan experienced its lowest and third-lowest rates in half a century. Last year’s figure represents a rebound from a virtually unprecedented low, so it can hardly be regarded as a peak in itself, and there is certainly no reason to take any pride in it. This is not even up to the standards seen when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in power. In 2001, the economy contracted by 1.65 percent, but in the following year it was growing at 5.26 percent.
That the Ma administration sees fit to harp on about something that one has no business being proud of simply demonstrates the diffidence of this government.
To add insult to injury, this 10.82 percent growth rate has made no actual improvement to the life of ordinary people in this country.
According to a recent online survey by two Web-based human resource companies on salaried workers’ attitudes about the price of everyday goods and services in Taiwan, 94 percent of respondents said they were concerned about rising prices. Many companies say they will adjust salaries upward, but according to the survey, 72 percent of respondents claim that their salaries have not gone up. The remaining 28 percent are the lucky ones, although in more than 90 percent of these cases the salary rise is less than 2 percent. With the rate of inflation taken into account, even these raises represent a reduction in salaries in real terms.
While the Ma administration is busy declaring grandiose-sounding economic figures, the reality is that the fat cats are getting fatter, while the ordinary person is suffering.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has