Sometimes you really do have to ask yourself whether President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is actually living in cloud cuckoo land.
Fresh from the fiasco of nominating a controversial “dinosaur” judge to the Council of Grand Justices, Ma got it wrong again in a comment he made about the economy. On Saturday he said that last year’s economic growth rate was the best the Taiwanese economy has seen in 63 years. What on earth is he talking about? This goes against the facts of Taiwan’s economic development. Ma was here during Taiwan’s most prosperous era, so how can he not recall those heady days?
Let’s look at the figures. Last year the economy grew at a rate of 10.82 percent. That’s a pretty healthy rate, but nothing out of the ordinary compared with the kinds of rates we were seeing from the 1960s to the 1980s, when figures exceeding 10 percent were relatively common. Specifically, in 1964, 1965 and 1967 the economic growth rate in Taiwan was 11.57, 10.85 and 10.41 percent, respectively.
The 1970s saw even higher rates. In 1970 the rate was 10.60 percent. The following year it jumped to 12.45 percent, which, though impressive, was trumped by 13.15 percent in 1972. It was slightly lower in 1973, at 11.83 percent, but then was back up again in 1976, reaching 13.45 percent. The highest figure was that of 1978, when the rate climbed to 13.49 percent.
Not wanting to labor the point, the 1980s saw growth rates of 11.00, 10.68 and 10.38 percent in 1986, 1987 and 1989 respectively.
Looking at these figures, one notices that the rate exceeded 11 percent on seven occasions. How, then, can Ma claim that last year’s rate represented the highest economic growth rate in 63 years?
The reason why last year’s rate was so high was simply because the base rate to which it was compared was so low. In 2008 and 2009, at the very beginning of Ma’s presidency, the growth rate was 0.73 percent and minus-1.93 percent respectively. For two years running, then, Taiwan experienced its lowest and third-lowest rates in half a century. Last year’s figure represents a rebound from a virtually unprecedented low, so it can hardly be regarded as a peak in itself, and there is certainly no reason to take any pride in it. This is not even up to the standards seen when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in power. In 2001, the economy contracted by 1.65 percent, but in the following year it was growing at 5.26 percent.
That the Ma administration sees fit to harp on about something that one has no business being proud of simply demonstrates the diffidence of this government.
To add insult to injury, this 10.82 percent growth rate has made no actual improvement to the life of ordinary people in this country.
According to a recent online survey by two Web-based human resource companies on salaried workers’ attitudes about the price of everyday goods and services in Taiwan, 94 percent of respondents said they were concerned about rising prices. Many companies say they will adjust salaries upward, but according to the survey, 72 percent of respondents claim that their salaries have not gone up. The remaining 28 percent are the lucky ones, although in more than 90 percent of these cases the salary rise is less than 2 percent. With the rate of inflation taken into account, even these raises represent a reduction in salaries in real terms.
While the Ma administration is busy declaring grandiose-sounding economic figures, the reality is that the fat cats are getting fatter, while the ordinary person is suffering.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS