Grief grips the hearts of many in Taiwan and around the world as streams of horrific images and news continue to play back the devastation in Japan caused by Friday’s massive earthquake and the ensuing tsunami. As many in Taiwan show their concern and support by either making donations, tweeting or updating their Facebook status with good wishes and prayers, it’s dumbfounding to learn that a senior aide to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Huang Chao-shun (黃昭順) has instead taken to kicking the Japanese when they are down.
Chao Chih-hsun’s (趙志勳) series of posts on his Facebook page were hateful, cruel and insensitive to say the least. With comments such as: “I would even like to attack Tokyo and kill tens of millions of people,” “I don’t regard them [the Japanese] as human beings” and “I am laughing as I watch the TV [broadcasting the earthquake and tsunami in Japan,] it’s great,” blatant language of hate and racism comes into full view.
While Huang was quick to express regret and apologized afterward, saying she had stripped Chao of his title as her office director, she did not mention that she would keep him on as an assistant.
It is equally inconceivable how Huang and the KMT have both failed to react responsibly in the face of Chao’s remarks.
How does President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who doubles as the KMT chairman, expect the public to take his pledges trumpeting the signing of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights seriously when he sits idly by without uttering a word of condemnation against a hateful tirade?
People who come to Chao’s defense arguing that his freedom of expression needs to be respected should be reminded that Article 20, paragraph 2 of the ICCPR states: “Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.”
Freedom of expression is an inalienable right, but not when it tramples on another person’s rights.
The KMT and Huang’s failure to act pales in comparison with the way Christian Dior and disability insurer Aflac Inc dealt with irresponsible, senseless behavior from their associates. Dior fired its creative director, British fashion designer John Galliano, for allegedly making anti-Semitic remarks, while Aflac terminated its relationship with comedian Gilbert Gottfried for making offending jokes about the tragedy in Japan on his Twitter account over the weekend.
The swift actions from Christian Dior and Aflac, including releases of stern statements, showed their zero tolerance for highly inappropriate remarks or behavior.
The stark comparison disheartens many in Taiwan, who wonder what sort of attitude the ruling party holds to allow individuals making hateful comments to get off the hook so easily.
It is little wonder then that Chao remains unapologetic in light of the controversy he has stirred, as suggested in his subsequent Facebook comments accusing the media of going after him with communist-style “literary persecutions.”
Granted, Taiwan currently does not have laws outlawing hate speech as some other countries do, but the very fact that Ma has signed into law the two covenants after legislative approval means the president and the government share equal responsibility in taking the lead in setting a good example.
As the saying goes: “Action speaks louder than words.” When words are not followed by concrete actions, it shows nothing but the hypocrisy of the preachers.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
RSS